Mercurial > pidgin.yaz
view doc/savedstatus-signals.dox @ 22640:23fe481afccf
The next version of RFC 3920, the draft of which can be found at http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-04.html, and subsequent email clarifications with Peter Saint-Andre and Alexey Melnikov indicate that we should be trying the next mechanism in line after one mechanism fails. We should also be ensuring that the mech list is sorted in order of descending security, which we don't do yet; however, servers are supposed to send us a sorted list, as well, so this isn't a major issue.
committer: Evan Schoenberg <evan.s@dreskin.net>
author | Stu Tomlinson <stu@nosnilmot.com> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:37:47 +0000 |
parents | e0613cf8c493 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
/** @page savedstatus-signals Saved Status Signals @signals @signal savedstatus-changed @endsignals @see savedstatus.h <hr> @signaldef savedstatus-changed @signalproto void (*savedstatus_changed)(PurpleSavedStatus *new, PurpleSavedStatus *old); @endsignalproto @signaldesc Emitted when a new saved status is activated. @endsignaldef */ // vim: syntax=c.doxygen tw=75 et