# HG changeset patch
# User Elliott Sales de Andrade <qulogic@pidgin.im>
# Date 1236918725 0
# Node ID 2321248ad70243c2e2ad144136df4c216abe7645
# Parent  00c659e55902d7d6dc4eb24935b49aea7ecc08ea# Parent  b03430dae08e901142ac0ec90cebc49bda57c42c
merge of '9ae083b7093cb3dc764443a54dbb8d2abe84a0b8'
     and 'e13689e4856dc0f8c93c715c70c76bce6a2babca'

diff -r b03430dae08e -r 2321248ad702 libpurple/util.c
--- a/libpurple/util.c	Fri Mar 13 04:29:11 2009 +0000
+++ b/libpurple/util.c	Fri Mar 13 04:32:05 2009 +0000
@@ -2850,6 +2850,12 @@
 	return "icon";
 }
 
+/*
+ * TODO: Consider using something faster than SHA-1, such as MD5, MD4
+ *       or CRC32.  Are there security implications to that?  Would
+ *       probably be a good idea to benchmark some algorithms with
+ *       3KB-10KB chunks of data (typical buddy icon sizes).
+ */
 char *
 purple_util_get_image_checksum(gconstpointer image_data, size_t image_len)
 {