annotate libpurple/protocols/zephyr/ZGetLocs.c @ 29685:6797736dbe37

Does anyone know the purpose of the ui_write, ui_read and data_not_sent FT UI callbacks? It looks like they allow a UI to decide how to safe incoming file transfers? They're not used in Pidgin or Finch. Are they used elsewhere? Valgrind is complaining about an invalid free. I think it happens either when the local user cancels a file transfer or when the remote user cancels a file transfer. I think this change fixes it. Revision fa4ce539e5025eb07aad3ca824cd4c512010d8a8 is related to these callbacks and to this change by foufou33@ gee male dot com The valgrind error is: ==23064== Invalid free() / delete / delete[] ==23064== at 0x4C24D68: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325) ==23064== by 0x9293209: g_array_free (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==23064== by 0x95B1995: purple_xfer_priv_data_destroy (ft.c:71) ==23064== by 0x92AA5D1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==23064== by 0x92AAE17: g_hash_table_remove_all (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==23064== by 0x92AAFC4: g_hash_table_destroy (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2200.3) ==23064== by 0x95B579C: purple_xfers_uninit (ft.c:1642) ==23064== by 0x95ACF08: purple_core_quit (core.c:238) ==23064== by 0x43EB3E: gtk_blist_delete_cb (gtkblist.c:227) ==23064== by 0x6F9A727: ??? (in /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.1800.3) ==23064== Address 0x2355f0e0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd

/* This file is part of the Project Athena Zephyr Notification System.
 * It contains source for the ZGetLocations function.
 *
 *	Created by:	Robert French
 *
 *	Copyright (c) 1987 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 *	For copying and distribution information, see the file
 *	"mit-copyright.h". 
 */

#include "internal.h"

#define min(a,b) ((a)<(b)?(a):(b))

/* Prototype for -Wmissing-prototypes */
Code_t ZGetLocations(ZLocations_t *location, int *numlocs);

Code_t ZGetLocations(ZLocations_t *location, int *numlocs)
{
    int i;
	
    if (!__locate_list)
	return (ZERR_NOLOCATIONS);

    if (__locate_next == __locate_num)
	return (ZERR_NOMORELOCS);
	
    for (i=0;i<min(*numlocs, __locate_num-__locate_next);i++)
	location[i] = __locate_list[i+__locate_next];

    if (__locate_num-__locate_next < *numlocs)
	*numlocs = __locate_num-__locate_next;

    __locate_next += *numlocs;
	
    return (ZERR_NONE);
}