annotate m4/gnome-x-checks.m4 @ 12097:d0662345799b

[gaim-migrate @ 14394] sf patch #1352658, from Evan Schoenberg "This simple patch adds a needed signal, buddy-icon-changed." And I removed buddy-icon-cached because I think this new signal is better. committer: Tailor Script <[e-mail]>

申鐃緒申     1 dnl GNOME_X_CHECKS
申鐃緒申     2 dnl
申鐃緒申     3 dnl Basic X11 related checks for X11.  At the end, the following will be
申鐃緒申     4 dnl defined/changed:
申鐃緒申     5 dnl   GTK_{CFLAGS,LIBS}      From AM_PATH_GTK
申鐃緒申     6 dnl   CPPFLAGS		     Will include $X_CFLAGS
申鐃緒申     7 dnl   GNOME_HAVE_SM	     `true' or `false' depending on whether session
申鐃緒申     8 dnl                          management is available.  It is available if
申鐃緒申     9 dnl                          both -lSM and X11/SM/SMlib.h exist.  (Some
申鐃緒申    10 dnl                          Solaris boxes have the library but not the header)
申鐃緒申    11 dnl   XPM_LIBS               -lXpm if Xpm library is present, otherwise ""
申鐃緒申    12 dnl
申鐃緒申    13 dnl The following configure cache variables are defined (but not used):
申鐃緒申    14 dnl   gnome_cv_passdown_{x_libs,X_LIBS,X_CFLAGS}
申鐃緒申    15 dnl
申鐃緒申    16 AC_DEFUN([GNOME_X_CHECKS],
申鐃緒申    17 [
申鐃緒申    18 	AM_PATH_GTK(1.2.0,,AC_MSG_ERROR(GTK not installed, or gtk-config not in path))
申鐃緒申    19 	dnl Hope that GTK_CFLAGS have only -I and -D.  Otherwise, we could
申鐃緒申    20 	dnl   test -z "$x_includes" || CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I$x_includes"
申鐃緒申    21 	dnl
申鐃緒申    22 	dnl Use CPPFLAGS instead of CFLAGS because AC_CHECK_HEADERS uses
申鐃緒申    23 	dnl CPPFLAGS, not CFLAGS
申鐃緒申    24         CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS $GTK_CFLAGS"
申鐃緒申    25 
申鐃緒申    26         saved_ldflags="$LDFLAGS"
申鐃緒申    27         LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS $GTK_LIBS"
申鐃緒申    28 
申鐃緒申    29 	gnome_cv_passdown_x_libs="$GTK_LIBS"
申鐃緒申    30 	gnome_cv_passdown_X_LIBS="$GTK_LIBS"
申鐃緒申    31 	gnome_cv_passdown_X_CFLAGS="$GTK_CFLAGS"
申鐃緒申    32 	gnome_cv_passdown_GTK_LIBS="$GTK_LIBS"
申鐃緒申    33 
申鐃緒申    34         LDFLAGS="$saved_ldflags $GTK_LIBS"
申鐃緒申    35 
申鐃緒申    36 dnl We are requiring GTK >= 1.1.1, which means this will be fine anyhow.
申鐃緒申    37 	USE_DEVGTK=true
申鐃緒申    38 
申鐃緒申    39 dnl	AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to use features from (unstable) GTK+ 1.1.x])
申鐃緒申    40 dnl	AC_EGREP_CPP(answer_affirmatively,
申鐃緒申    41 dnl	[#include <gtk/gtkfeatures.h>
申鐃緒申    42 dnl	#ifdef GTK_HAVE_FEATURES_1_1_0
申鐃緒申    43 dnl	   answer_affirmatively
申鐃緒申    44 dnl	#endif
申鐃緒申    45 dnl	], dev_gtk=yes, dev_gtk=no)
申鐃緒申    46 dnl	if test "$dev_gtk" = "yes"; then
申鐃緒申    47 dnl	   USE_DEVGTK=true
申鐃緒申    48 dnl	fi
申鐃緒申    49 dnl	AC_MSG_RESULT("$dev_gtk")
申鐃緒申    50 
申鐃緒申    51 	GNOME_HAVE_SM=true
申鐃緒申    52 	case "$GTK_LIBS" in
申鐃緒申    53 	 *-lSM*)
申鐃緒申    54 	    dnl Already found it.
申鐃緒申    55 	    ;;
申鐃緒申    56 	 *)
申鐃緒申    57 	    dnl Assume that if we have -lSM then we also have -lICE.
申鐃緒申    58 	    AC_CHECK_LIB(SM, SmcSaveYourselfDone,
申鐃緒申    59 	        [GTK_LIBS="-lSM -lICE $GTK_LIBS"],GNOME_HAVE_SM=false,
申鐃緒申    60 		$x_libs -lICE)
申鐃緒申    61 	    ;;
申鐃緒申    62 	esac
申鐃緒申    63 
申鐃緒申    64 	if test "$GNOME_HAVE_SM" = true; then
申鐃緒申    65 	   AC_CHECK_HEADERS(X11/SM/SMlib.h,,GNOME_HAVE_SM=false)
申鐃緒申    66 	fi
申鐃緒申    67 
申鐃緒申    68 	if test "$GNOME_HAVE_SM" = true; then
申鐃緒申    69 	   AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBSM)
申鐃緒申    70 	fi
申鐃緒申    71 
申鐃緒申    72 	XPM_LIBS=""
申鐃緒申    73 	AC_CHECK_LIB(Xpm, XpmFreeXpmImage, [XPM_LIBS="-lXpm"], , $x_libs)
申鐃緒申    74 	AC_SUBST(XPM_LIBS)
申鐃緒申    75 
申鐃緒申    76 	AC_REQUIRE([GNOME_PTHREAD_CHECK])
申鐃緒申    77         LDFLAGS="$saved_ldflags"
申鐃緒申    78 
申鐃緒申    79 	AC_PROVIDE([GNOME_X_CHECKS])
申鐃緒申    80 ])