comparison libpurple/protocols/msn/directconn.c @ 27892:4f7eded28919

The amount of indirection in the msn prpl bothers me, so I'm flatteneing this call chain one level

27891:43448eca27d9

	msn_directconn_write(directconn, body, body_len);
}

static void
msn_directconn_process_msg(MsnDirectConn *directconn, MsnMessage *msg)
{
	purple_debug_info("msn", "directconn: process_msg\n");

	msn_slplink_process_msg(directconn->slplink, msg);
}

static void
read_cb(gpointer data, gint source, PurpleInputCondition cond)
{
	MsnDirectConn* directconn;
	char *body;
	size_t body_len;

		directconn->c++;

		msg = msn_message_new_msnslp();
		msn_message_parse_slp_body(msg, body, body_len);

		msn_directconn_process_msg(directconn, msg);
	}
	else
	{
		/* ERROR */
		purple_debug_error("msn", "error reading\n");

27892:4f7eded28919

	msn_directconn_write(directconn, body, body_len);
}

static void
read_cb(gpointer data, gint source, PurpleInputCondition cond)
{
	MsnDirectConn* directconn;
	char *body;
	size_t body_len;

		directconn->c++;

		msg = msn_message_new_msnslp();
		msn_message_parse_slp_body(msg, body, body_len);

		purple_debug_info("msn", "directconn: process_msg\n");
		msn_slplink_process_msg(directconn->slplink, msg);
	}
	else
	{
		/* ERROR */
		purple_debug_error("msn", "error reading\n");