comparison libpurple/protocols/msn/directconn.c @ 18431:5bc6c4097a77

accept() wants a pointer to a socklen_t, not an unsigned int. This has no programattic effect, since we don't actually use the return value, but it silences a warning on my system.

18430:0877d661a6ff

		fd = source;
	}
	else
	{
		struct sockaddr_in client_addr;
		unsigned int client;
		fd = accept (source, (struct sockaddr *)&client_addr, &client);
	}

	directconn->fd = fd;

18431:5bc6c4097a77

		fd = source;
	}
	else
	{
		struct sockaddr_in client_addr;
		socklen_t client;
		fd = accept (source, (struct sockaddr *)&client_addr, &client);
	}

	directconn->fd = fd;