Mercurial > pidgin
comparison libpurple/protocols/irc/PROTOCOL @ 15373:5fe8042783c1
Rename gtk/ and libgaim/ to pidgin/ and libpurple/
author | Sean Egan <seanegan@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:32:10 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
15372:f79e0f4df793 | 15373:5fe8042783c1 |
---|---|
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 Network Working Group J. Oikarinen | |
8 Request for Comments: 1459 D. Reed | |
9 May 1993 | |
10 | |
11 | |
12 Internet Relay Chat Protocol | |
13 | |
14 Status of This Memo | |
15 | |
16 This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet | |
17 community. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. | |
18 Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol | |
19 Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol. | |
20 Distribution of this memo is unlimited. | |
21 | |
22 Abstract | |
23 | |
24 The IRC protocol was developed over the last 4 years since it was | |
25 first implemented as a means for users on a BBS to chat amongst | |
26 themselves. Now it supports a world-wide network of servers and | |
27 clients, and is stringing to cope with growth. Over the past 2 years, | |
28 the average number of users connected to the main IRC network has | |
29 grown by a factor of 10. | |
30 | |
31 The IRC protocol is a text-based protocol, with the simplest client | |
32 being any socket program capable of connecting to the server. | |
33 | |
34 Table of Contents | |
35 | |
36 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 4 | |
37 1.1 Servers ................................................ 4 | |
38 1.2 Clients ................................................ 5 | |
39 1.2.1 Operators .......................................... 5 | |
40 1.3 Channels ................................................ 5 | |
41 1.3.1 Channel Operators .................................... 6 | |
42 2. THE IRC SPECIFICATION ....................................... 7 | |
43 2.1 Overview ................................................ 7 | |
44 2.2 Character codes ......................................... 7 | |
45 2.3 Messages ................................................ 7 | |
46 2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF .................... 8 | |
47 2.4 Numeric replies ......................................... 10 | |
48 3. IRC Concepts ................................................ 10 | |
49 3.1 One-to-one communication ................................ 10 | |
50 3.2 One-to-many ............................................. 11 | |
51 3.2.1 To a list .......................................... 11 | |
52 3.2.2 To a group (channel) ............................... 11 | |
53 3.2.3 To a host/server mask .............................. 12 | |
54 3.3 One to all .............................................. 12 | |
55 | |
56 | |
57 | |
58 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 1] | |
59 | |
60 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
61 | |
62 | |
63 3.3.1 Client to Client ................................... 12 | |
64 3.3.2 Clients to Server .................................. 12 | |
65 3.3.3 Server to Server ................................... 12 | |
66 4. MESSAGE DETAILS ............................................. 13 | |
67 4.1 Connection Registration ................................. 13 | |
68 4.1.1 Password message ................................... 14 | |
69 4.1.2 Nickname message ................................... 14 | |
70 4.1.3 User message ....................................... 15 | |
71 4.1.4 Server message ..................................... 16 | |
72 4.1.5 Operator message ................................... 17 | |
73 4.1.6 Quit message ....................................... 17 | |
74 4.1.7 Server Quit message ................................ 18 | |
75 4.2 Channel operations ...................................... 19 | |
76 4.2.1 Join message ....................................... 19 | |
77 4.2.2 Part message ....................................... 20 | |
78 4.2.3 Mode message ....................................... 21 | |
79 4.2.3.1 Channel modes ................................. 21 | |
80 4.2.3.2 User modes .................................... 22 | |
81 4.2.4 Topic message ...................................... 23 | |
82 4.2.5 Names message ...................................... 24 | |
83 4.2.6 List message ....................................... 24 | |
84 4.2.7 Invite message ..................................... 25 | |
85 4.2.8 Kick message ....................................... 25 | |
86 4.3 Server queries and commands ............................. 26 | |
87 4.3.1 Version message .................................... 26 | |
88 4.3.2 Stats message ...................................... 27 | |
89 4.3.3 Links message ...................................... 28 | |
90 4.3.4 Time message ....................................... 29 | |
91 4.3.5 Connect message .................................... 29 | |
92 4.3.6 Trace message ...................................... 30 | |
93 4.3.7 Admin message ...................................... 31 | |
94 4.3.8 Info message ....................................... 31 | |
95 4.4 Sending messages ........................................ 32 | |
96 4.4.1 Private messages ................................... 32 | |
97 4.4.2 Notice messages .................................... 33 | |
98 4.5 User-based queries ...................................... 33 | |
99 4.5.1 Who query .......................................... 33 | |
100 4.5.2 Whois query ........................................ 34 | |
101 4.5.3 Whowas message ..................................... 35 | |
102 4.6 Miscellaneous messages .................................. 35 | |
103 4.6.1 Kill message ....................................... 36 | |
104 4.6.2 Ping message ....................................... 37 | |
105 4.6.3 Pong message ....................................... 37 | |
106 4.6.4 Error message ...................................... 38 | |
107 5. OPTIONAL MESSAGES ........................................... 38 | |
108 5.1 Away message ............................................ 38 | |
109 5.2 Rehash command .......................................... 39 | |
110 5.3 Restart command ......................................... 39 | |
111 | |
112 | |
113 | |
114 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 2] | |
115 | |
116 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
117 | |
118 | |
119 5.4 Summon message .......................................... 40 | |
120 5.5 Users message ........................................... 40 | |
121 5.6 Operwall command ........................................ 41 | |
122 5.7 Userhost message ........................................ 42 | |
123 5.8 Ison message ............................................ 42 | |
124 6. REPLIES ..................................................... 43 | |
125 6.1 Error Replies ........................................... 43 | |
126 6.2 Command responses ....................................... 48 | |
127 6.3 Reserved numerics ....................................... 56 | |
128 7. Client and server authentication ............................ 56 | |
129 8. Current Implementations Details ............................. 56 | |
130 8.1 Network protocol: TCP ................................... 57 | |
131 8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets ............................ 57 | |
132 8.2 Command Parsing ......................................... 57 | |
133 8.3 Message delivery ........................................ 57 | |
134 8.4 Connection 'Liveness' ................................... 58 | |
135 8.5 Establishing a server-client connection ................. 58 | |
136 8.6 Establishing a server-server connection ................. 58 | |
137 8.6.1 State information exchange when connecting ......... 59 | |
138 8.7 Terminating server-client connections ................... 59 | |
139 8.8 Terminating server-server connections ................... 59 | |
140 8.9 Tracking nickname changes ............................... 60 | |
141 8.10 Flood control of clients ............................... 60 | |
142 8.11 Non-blocking lookups ................................... 61 | |
143 8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups ............................ 61 | |
144 8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups .......................... 61 | |
145 8.12 Configuration file ..................................... 61 | |
146 8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect ....................... 62 | |
147 8.12.2 Operators ......................................... 62 | |
148 8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect ....................... 62 | |
149 8.12.4 Administrivia ..................................... 63 | |
150 8.13 Channel membership ..................................... 63 | |
151 9. Current problems ............................................ 63 | |
152 9.1 Scalability ............................................. 63 | |
153 9.2 Labels .................................................. 63 | |
154 9.2.1 Nicknames .......................................... 63 | |
155 9.2.2 Channels ........................................... 64 | |
156 9.2.3 Servers ............................................ 64 | |
157 9.3 Algorithms .............................................. 64 | |
158 10. Support and availability ................................... 64 | |
159 11. Security Considerations .................................... 65 | |
160 12. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 65 | |
161 | |
162 | |
163 | |
164 | |
165 | |
166 | |
167 | |
168 | |
169 | |
170 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 3] | |
171 | |
172 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
173 | |
174 | |
175 1. INTRODUCTION | |
176 | |
177 The IRC (Internet Relay Chat) protocol has been designed over a | |
178 number of years for use with text based conferencing. This document | |
179 describes the current IRC protocol. | |
180 | |
181 The IRC protocol has been developed on systems using the TCP/IP | |
182 network protocol, although there is no requirement that this remain | |
183 the only sphere in which it operates. | |
184 | |
185 IRC itself is a teleconferencing system, which (through the use of | |
186 the client-server model) is well-suited to running on many machines | |
187 in a distributed fashion. A typical setup involves a single process | |
188 (the server) forming a central point for clients (or other servers) | |
189 to connect to, performing the required message delivery/multiplexing | |
190 and other functions. | |
191 | |
192 1.1 Servers | |
193 | |
194 The server forms the backbone of IRC, providing a point to which | |
195 clients may connect to to talk to each other, and a point for other | |
196 servers to connect to, forming an IRC network. The only network | |
197 configuration allowed for IRC servers is that of a spanning tree [see | |
198 Fig. 1] where each server acts as a central node for the rest of the | |
199 net it sees. | |
200 | |
201 | |
202 [ Server 15 ] [ Server 13 ] [ Server 14] | |
203 / \ / | |
204 / \ / | |
205 [ Server 11 ] ------ [ Server 1 ] [ Server 12] | |
206 / \ / | |
207 / \ / | |
208 [ Server 2 ] [ Server 3 ] | |
209 / \ \ | |
210 / \ \ | |
211 [ Server 4 ] [ Server 5 ] [ Server 6 ] | |
212 / | \ / | |
213 / | \ / | |
214 / | \____ / | |
215 / | \ / | |
216 [ Server 7 ] [ Server 8 ] [ Server 9 ] [ Server 10 ] | |
217 | |
218 : | |
219 [ etc. ] | |
220 : | |
221 | |
222 [ Fig. 1. Format of IRC server network ] | |
223 | |
224 | |
225 | |
226 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 4] | |
227 | |
228 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
229 | |
230 | |
231 1.2 Clients | |
232 | |
233 A client is anything connecting to a server that is not another | |
234 server. Each client is distinguished from other clients by a unique | |
235 nickname having a maximum length of nine (9) characters. See the | |
236 protocol grammar rules for what may and may not be used in a | |
237 nickname. In addition to the nickname, all servers must have the | |
238 following information about all clients: the real name of the host | |
239 that the client is running on, the username of the client on that | |
240 host, and the server to which the client is connected. | |
241 | |
242 1.2.1 Operators | |
243 | |
244 To allow a reasonable amount of order to be kept within the IRC | |
245 network, a special class of clients (operators) is allowed to perform | |
246 general maintenance functions on the network. Although the powers | |
247 granted to an operator can be considered as 'dangerous', they are | |
248 nonetheless required. Operators should be able to perform basic | |
249 network tasks such as disconnecting and reconnecting servers as | |
250 needed to prevent long-term use of bad network routing. In | |
251 recognition of this need, the protocol discussed herein provides for | |
252 operators only to be able to perform such functions. See sections | |
253 4.1.7 (SQUIT) and 4.3.5 (CONNECT). | |
254 | |
255 A more controversial power of operators is the ability to remove a | |
256 user from the connected network by 'force', i.e. operators are able | |
257 to close the connection between any client and server. The | |
258 justification for this is delicate since its abuse is both | |
259 destructive and annoying. For further details on this type of | |
260 action, see section 4.6.1 (KILL). | |
261 | |
262 1.3 Channels | |
263 | |
264 A channel is a named group of one or more clients which will all | |
265 receive messages addressed to that channel. The channel is created | |
266 implicitly when the first client joins it, and the channel ceases to | |
267 exist when the last client leaves it. While channel exists, any | |
268 client can reference the channel using the name of the channel. | |
269 | |
270 Channels names are strings (beginning with a '&' or '#' character) of | |
271 length up to 200 characters. Apart from the the requirement that the | |
272 first character being either '&' or '#'; the only restriction on a | |
273 channel name is that it may not contain any spaces (' '), a control G | |
274 (^G or ASCII 7), or a comma (',' which is used as a list item | |
275 separator by the protocol). | |
276 | |
277 There are two types of channels allowed by this protocol. One is a | |
278 distributed channel which is known to all the servers that are | |
279 | |
280 | |
281 | |
282 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 5] | |
283 | |
284 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
285 | |
286 | |
287 connected to the network. These channels are marked by the first | |
288 character being a only clients on the server where it exists may join | |
289 it. These are distinguished by a leading '&' character. On top of | |
290 these two types, there are the various channel modes available to | |
291 alter the characteristics of individual channels. See section 4.2.3 | |
292 (MODE command) for more details on this. | |
293 | |
294 To create a new channel or become part of an existing channel, a user | |
295 is required to JOIN the channel. If the channel doesn't exist prior | |
296 to joining, the channel is created and the creating user becomes a | |
297 channel operator. If the channel already exists, whether or not your | |
298 request to JOIN that channel is honoured depends on the current modes | |
299 of the channel. For example, if the channel is invite-only, (+i), | |
300 then you may only join if invited. As part of the protocol, a user | |
301 may be a part of several channels at once, but a limit of ten (10) | |
302 channels is recommended as being ample for both experienced and | |
303 novice users. See section 8.13 for more information on this. | |
304 | |
305 If the IRC network becomes disjoint because of a split between two | |
306 servers, the channel on each side is only composed of those clients | |
307 which are connected to servers on the respective sides of the split, | |
308 possibly ceasing to exist on one side of the split. When the split | |
309 is healed, the connecting servers announce to each other who they | |
310 think is in each channel and the mode of that channel. If the | |
311 channel exists on both sides, the JOINs and MODEs are interpreted in | |
312 an inclusive manner so that both sides of the new connection will | |
313 agree about which clients are in the channel and what modes the | |
314 channel has. | |
315 | |
316 1.3.1 Channel Operators | |
317 | |
318 The channel operator (also referred to as a "chop" or "chanop") on a | |
319 given channel is considered to 'own' that channel. In recognition of | |
320 this status, channel operators are endowed with certain powers which | |
321 enable them to keep control and some sort of sanity in their channel. | |
322 As an owner of a channel, a channel operator is not required to have | |
323 reasons for their actions, although if their actions are generally | |
324 antisocial or otherwise abusive, it might be reasonable to ask an IRC | |
325 operator to intervene, or for the usersjust leave and go elsewhere | |
326 and form their own channel. | |
327 | |
328 The commands which may only be used by channel operators are: | |
329 | |
330 KICK - Eject a client from the channel | |
331 MODE - Change the channel's mode | |
332 INVITE - Invite a client to an invite-only channel (mode +i) | |
333 TOPIC - Change the channel topic in a mode +t channel | |
334 | |
335 | |
336 | |
337 | |
338 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 6] | |
339 | |
340 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
341 | |
342 | |
343 A channel operator is identified by the '@' symbol next to their | |
344 nickname whenever it is associated with a channel (ie replies to the | |
345 NAMES, WHO and WHOIS commands). | |
346 | |
347 2. The IRC Specification | |
348 | |
349 2.1 Overview | |
350 | |
351 The protocol as described herein is for use both with server to | |
352 server and client to server connections. There are, however, more | |
353 restrictions on client connections (which are considered to be | |
354 untrustworthy) than on server connections. | |
355 | |
356 2.2 Character codes | |
357 | |
358 No specific character set is specified. The protocol is based on a a | |
359 set of codes which are composed of eight (8) bits, making up an | |
360 octet. Each message may be composed of any number of these octets; | |
361 however, some octet values are used for control codes which act as | |
362 message delimiters. | |
363 | |
364 Regardless of being an 8-bit protocol, the delimiters and keywords | |
365 are such that protocol is mostly usable from USASCII terminal and a | |
366 telnet connection. | |
367 | |
368 Because of IRC's scandanavian origin, the characters {}| are | |
369 considered to be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\, | |
370 respectively. This is a critical issue when determining the | |
371 equivalence of two nicknames. | |
372 | |
373 2.3 Messages | |
374 | |
375 Servers and clients send eachother messages which may or may not | |
376 generate a reply. If the message contains a valid command, as | |
377 described in later sections, the client should expect a reply as | |
378 specified but it is not advised to wait forever for the reply; client | |
379 to server and server to server communication is essentially | |
380 asynchronous in nature. | |
381 | |
382 Each IRC message may consist of up to three main parts: the prefix | |
383 (optional), the command, and the command parameters (of which there | |
384 may be up to 15). The prefix, command, and all parameters are | |
385 separated by one (or more) ASCII space character(s) (0x20). | |
386 | |
387 The presence of a prefix is indicated with a single leading ASCII | |
388 colon character (':', 0x3b), which must be the first character of the | |
389 message itself. There must be no gap (whitespace) between the colon | |
390 and the prefix. The prefix is used by servers to indicate the true | |
391 | |
392 | |
393 | |
394 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 7] | |
395 | |
396 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
397 | |
398 | |
399 origin of the message. If the prefix is missing from the message, it | |
400 is assumed to have originated from the connection from which it was | |
401 received. Clients should not use prefix when sending a message from | |
402 themselves; if they use a prefix, the only valid prefix is the | |
403 registered nickname associated with the client. If the source | |
404 identified by the prefix cannot be found from the server's internal | |
405 database, or if the source is registered from a different link than | |
406 from which the message arrived, the server must ignore the message | |
407 silently. | |
408 | |
409 The command must either be a valid IRC command or a three (3) digit | |
410 number represented in ASCII text. | |
411 | |
412 IRC messages are always lines of characters terminated with a CR-LF | |
413 (Carriage Return - Line Feed) pair, and these messages shall not | |
414 exceed 512 characters in length, counting all characters including | |
415 the trailing CR-LF. Thus, there are 510 characters maximum allowed | |
416 for the command and its parameters. There is no provision for | |
417 continuation message lines. See section 7 for more details about | |
418 current implementations. | |
419 | |
420 2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF | |
421 | |
422 The protocol messages must be extracted from the contiguous stream of | |
423 octets. The current solution is to designate two characters, CR and | |
424 LF, as message separators. Empty messages are silently ignored, | |
425 which permits use of the sequence CR-LF between messages | |
426 without extra problems. | |
427 | |
428 The extracted message is parsed into the components <prefix>, | |
429 <command> and list of parameters matched either by <middle> or | |
430 <trailing> components. | |
431 | |
432 The BNF representation for this is: | |
433 | |
434 | |
435 <message> ::= [':' <prefix> <SPACE> ] <command> <params> <crlf> | |
436 <prefix> ::= <servername> | <nick> [ '!' <user> ] [ '@' <host> ] | |
437 <command> ::= <letter> { <letter> } | <number> <number> <number> | |
438 <SPACE> ::= ' ' { ' ' } | |
439 <params> ::= <SPACE> [ ':' <trailing> | <middle> <params> ] | |
440 | |
441 <middle> ::= <Any *non-empty* sequence of octets not including SPACE | |
442 or NUL or CR or LF, the first of which may not be ':'> | |
443 <trailing> ::= <Any, possibly *empty*, sequence of octets not including | |
444 NUL or CR or LF> | |
445 | |
446 <crlf> ::= CR LF | |
447 | |
448 | |
449 | |
450 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 8] | |
451 | |
452 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
453 | |
454 | |
455 NOTES: | |
456 | |
457 1) <SPACE> is consists only of SPACE character(s) (0x20). | |
458 Specially notice that TABULATION, and all other control | |
459 characters are considered NON-WHITE-SPACE. | |
460 | |
461 2) After extracting the parameter list, all parameters are equal, | |
462 whether matched by <middle> or <trailing>. <Trailing> is just | |
463 a syntactic trick to allow SPACE within parameter. | |
464 | |
465 3) The fact that CR and LF cannot appear in parameter strings is | |
466 just artifact of the message framing. This might change later. | |
467 | |
468 4) The NUL character is not special in message framing, and | |
469 basically could end up inside a parameter, but as it would | |
470 cause extra complexities in normal C string handling. Therefore | |
471 NUL is not allowed within messages. | |
472 | |
473 5) The last parameter may be an empty string. | |
474 | |
475 6) Use of the extended prefix (['!' <user> ] ['@' <host> ]) must | |
476 not be used in server to server communications and is only | |
477 intended for server to client messages in order to provide | |
478 clients with more useful information about who a message is | |
479 from without the need for additional queries. | |
480 | |
481 Most protocol messages specify additional semantics and syntax for | |
482 the extracted parameter strings dictated by their position in the | |
483 list. For example, many server commands will assume that the first | |
484 parameter after the command is the list of targets, which can be | |
485 described with: | |
486 | |
487 <target> ::= <to> [ "," <target> ] | |
488 <to> ::= <channel> | <user> '@' <servername> | <nick> | <mask> | |
489 <channel> ::= ('#' | '&') <chstring> | |
490 <servername> ::= <host> | |
491 <host> ::= see RFC 952 [DNS:4] for details on allowed hostnames | |
492 <nick> ::= <letter> { <letter> | <number> | <special> } | |
493 <mask> ::= ('#' | '$') <chstring> | |
494 <chstring> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE, BELL, NUL, CR, LF and | |
495 comma (',')> | |
496 | |
497 Other parameter syntaxes are: | |
498 | |
499 <user> ::= <nonwhite> { <nonwhite> } | |
500 <letter> ::= 'a' ... 'z' | 'A' ... 'Z' | |
501 <number> ::= '0' ... '9' | |
502 <special> ::= '-' | '[' | ']' | '\' | '`' | '^' | '{' | '}' | |
503 | |
504 | |
505 | |
506 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 9] | |
507 | |
508 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
509 | |
510 | |
511 <nonwhite> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE (0x20), NUL (0x0), CR | |
512 (0xd), and LF (0xa)> | |
513 | |
514 2.4 Numeric replies | |
515 | |
516 Most of the messages sent to the server generate a reply of some | |
517 sort. The most common reply is the numeric reply, used for both | |
518 errors and normal replies. The numeric reply must be sent as one | |
519 message consisting of the sender prefix, the three digit numeric, and | |
520 the target of the reply. A numeric reply is not allowed to originate | |
521 from a client; any such messages received by a server are silently | |
522 dropped. In all other respects, a numeric reply is just like a normal | |
523 message, except that the keyword is made up of 3 numeric digits | |
524 rather than a string of letters. A list of different replies is | |
525 supplied in section 6. | |
526 | |
527 3. IRC Concepts. | |
528 | |
529 This section is devoted to describing the actual concepts behind the | |
530 organization of the IRC protocol and how the current | |
531 implementations deliver different classes of messages. | |
532 | |
533 | |
534 | |
535 1--\ | |
536 A D---4 | |
537 2--/ \ / | |
538 B----C | |
539 / \ | |
540 3 E | |
541 | |
542 Servers: A, B, C, D, E Clients: 1, 2, 3, 4 | |
543 | |
544 [ Fig. 2. Sample small IRC network ] | |
545 | |
546 3.1 One-to-one communication | |
547 | |
548 Communication on a one-to-one basis is usually only performed by | |
549 clients, since most server-server traffic is not a result of servers | |
550 talking only to each other. To provide a secure means for clients to | |
551 talk to each other, it is required that all servers be able to send a | |
552 message in exactly one direction along the spanning tree in order to | |
553 reach any client. The path of a message being delivered is the | |
554 shortest path between any two points on the spanning tree. | |
555 | |
556 The following examples all refer to Figure 2 above. | |
557 | |
558 | |
559 | |
560 | |
561 | |
562 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 10] | |
563 | |
564 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
565 | |
566 | |
567 Example 1: | |
568 A message between clients 1 and 2 is only seen by server A, which | |
569 sends it straight to client 2. | |
570 | |
571 Example 2: | |
572 A message between clients 1 and 3 is seen by servers A & B, and | |
573 client 3. No other clients or servers are allowed see the message. | |
574 | |
575 Example 3: | |
576 A message between clients 2 and 4 is seen by servers A, B, C & D | |
577 and client 4 only. | |
578 | |
579 3.2 One-to-many | |
580 | |
581 The main goal of IRC is to provide a forum which allows easy and | |
582 efficient conferencing (one to many conversations). IRC offers | |
583 several means to achieve this, each serving its own purpose. | |
584 | |
585 3.2.1 To a list | |
586 | |
587 The least efficient style of one-to-many conversation is through | |
588 clients talking to a 'list' of users. How this is done is almost | |
589 self explanatory: the client gives a list of destinations to which | |
590 the message is to be delivered and the server breaks it up and | |
591 dispatches a separate copy of the message to each given destination. | |
592 This isn't as efficient as using a group since the destination list | |
593 is broken up and the dispatch sent without checking to make sure | |
594 duplicates aren't sent down each path. | |
595 | |
596 3.2.2 To a group (channel) | |
597 | |
598 In IRC the channel has a role equivalent to that of the multicast | |
599 group; their existence is dynamic (coming and going as people join | |
600 and leave channels) and the actual conversation carried out on a | |
601 channel is only sent to servers which are supporting users on a given | |
602 channel. If there are multiple users on a server in the same | |
603 channel, the message text is sent only once to that server and then | |
604 sent to each client on the channel. This action is then repeated for | |
605 each client-server combination until the original message has fanned | |
606 out and reached each member of the channel. | |
607 | |
608 The following examples all refer to Figure 2. | |
609 | |
610 Example 4: | |
611 Any channel with 1 client in it. Messages to the channel go to the | |
612 server and then nowhere else. | |
613 | |
614 | |
615 | |
616 | |
617 | |
618 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 11] | |
619 | |
620 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
621 | |
622 | |
623 Example 5: | |
624 2 clients in a channel. All messages traverse a path as if they | |
625 were private messages between the two clients outside a channel. | |
626 | |
627 Example 6: | |
628 Clients 1, 2 and 3 in a channel. All messages to the channel are | |
629 sent to all clients and only those servers which must be traversed | |
630 by the message if it were a private message to a single client. If | |
631 client 1 sends a message, it goes back to client 2 and then via | |
632 server B to client 3. | |
633 | |
634 3.2.3 To a host/server mask | |
635 | |
636 To provide IRC operators with some mechanism to send messages to a | |
637 large body of related users, host and server mask messages are | |
638 provided. These messages are sent to users whose host or server | |
639 information match that of the mask. The messages are only sent to | |
640 locations where users are, in a fashion similar to that of channels. | |
641 | |
642 3.3 One-to-all | |
643 | |
644 The one-to-all type of message is better described as a broadcast | |
645 message, sent to all clients or servers or both. On a large network | |
646 of users and servers, a single message can result in a lot of traffic | |
647 being sent over the network in an effort to reach all of the desired | |
648 destinations. | |
649 | |
650 For some messages, there is no option but to broadcast it to all | |
651 servers so that the state information held by each server is | |
652 reasonably consistent between servers. | |
653 | |
654 3.3.1 Client-to-Client | |
655 | |
656 There is no class of message which, from a single message, results in | |
657 a message being sent to every other client. | |
658 | |
659 3.3.2 Client-to-Server | |
660 | |
661 Most of the commands which result in a change of state information | |
662 (such as channel membership, channel mode, user status, etc) must be | |
663 sent to all servers by default, and this distribution may not be | |
664 changed by the client. | |
665 | |
666 3.3.3 Server-to-Server. | |
667 | |
668 While most messages between servers are distributed to all 'other' | |
669 servers, this is only required for any message that affects either a | |
670 user, channel or server. Since these are the basic items found in | |
671 | |
672 | |
673 | |
674 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 12] | |
675 | |
676 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
677 | |
678 | |
679 IRC, nearly all messages originating from a server are broadcast to | |
680 all other connected servers. | |
681 | |
682 4. Message details | |
683 | |
684 On the following pages are descriptions of each message recognized by | |
685 the IRC server and client. All commands described in this section | |
686 must be implemented by any server for this protocol. | |
687 | |
688 Where the reply ERR_NOSUCHSERVER is listed, it means that the | |
689 <server> parameter could not be found. The server must not send any | |
690 other replies after this for that command. | |
691 | |
692 The server to which a client is connected is required to parse the | |
693 complete message, returning any appropriate errors. If the server | |
694 encounters a fatal error while parsing a message, an error must be | |
695 sent back to the client and the parsing terminated. A fatal error | |
696 may be considered to be incorrect command, a destination which is | |
697 otherwise unknown to the server (server, nick or channel names fit | |
698 this category), not enough parameters or incorrect privileges. | |
699 | |
700 If a full set of parameters is presented, then each must be checked | |
701 for validity and appropriate responses sent back to the client. In | |
702 the case of messages which use parameter lists using the comma as an | |
703 item separator, a reply must be sent for each item. | |
704 | |
705 In the examples below, some messages appear using the full format: | |
706 | |
707 :Name COMMAND parameter list | |
708 | |
709 Such examples represent a message from "Name" in transit between | |
710 servers, where it is essential to include the name of the original | |
711 sender of the message so remote servers may send back a reply along | |
712 the correct path. | |
713 | |
714 4.1 Connection Registration | |
715 | |
716 The commands described here are used to register a connection with an | |
717 IRC server as either a user or a server as well as correctly | |
718 disconnect. | |
719 | |
720 A "PASS" command is not required for either client or server | |
721 connection to be registered, but it must precede the server message | |
722 or the latter of the NICK/USER combination. It is strongly | |
723 recommended that all server connections have a password in order to | |
724 give some level of security to the actual connections. The | |
725 recommended order for a client to register is as follows: | |
726 | |
727 | |
728 | |
729 | |
730 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 13] | |
731 | |
732 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
733 | |
734 | |
735 1. Pass message | |
736 2. Nick message | |
737 3. User message | |
738 | |
739 4.1.1 Password message | |
740 | |
741 | |
742 Command: PASS | |
743 Parameters: <password> | |
744 | |
745 The PASS command is used to set a 'connection password'. The | |
746 password can and must be set before any attempt to register the | |
747 connection is made. Currently this requires that clients send a PASS | |
748 command before sending the NICK/USER combination and servers *must* | |
749 send a PASS command before any SERVER command. The password supplied | |
750 must match the one contained in the C/N lines (for servers) or I | |
751 lines (for clients). It is possible to send multiple PASS commands | |
752 before registering but only the last one sent is used for | |
753 verification and it may not be changed once registered. Numeric | |
754 Replies: | |
755 | |
756 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED | |
757 | |
758 Example: | |
759 | |
760 PASS secretpasswordhere | |
761 | |
762 4.1.2 Nick message | |
763 | |
764 Command: NICK | |
765 Parameters: <nickname> [ <hopcount> ] | |
766 | |
767 NICK message is used to give user a nickname or change the previous | |
768 one. The <hopcount> parameter is only used by servers to indicate | |
769 how far away a nick is from its home server. A local connection has | |
770 a hopcount of 0. If supplied by a client, it must be ignored. | |
771 | |
772 If a NICK message arrives at a server which already knows about an | |
773 identical nickname for another client, a nickname collision occurs. | |
774 As a result of a nickname collision, all instances of the nickname | |
775 are removed from the server's database, and a KILL command is issued | |
776 to remove the nickname from all other server's database. If the NICK | |
777 message causing the collision was a nickname change, then the | |
778 original (old) nick must be removed as well. | |
779 | |
780 If the server recieves an identical NICK from a client which is | |
781 directly connected, it may issue an ERR_NICKCOLLISION to the local | |
782 client, drop the NICK command, and not generate any kills. | |
783 | |
784 | |
785 | |
786 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 14] | |
787 | |
788 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
789 | |
790 | |
791 Numeric Replies: | |
792 | |
793 ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME | |
794 ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE ERR_NICKCOLLISION | |
795 | |
796 Example: | |
797 | |
798 NICK Wiz ; Introducing new nick "Wiz". | |
799 | |
800 :WiZ NICK Kilroy ; WiZ changed his nickname to Kilroy. | |
801 | |
802 4.1.3 User message | |
803 | |
804 Command: USER | |
805 Parameters: <username> <hostname> <servername> <realname> | |
806 | |
807 The USER message is used at the beginning of connection to specify | |
808 the username, hostname, servername and realname of s new user. It is | |
809 also used in communication between servers to indicate new user | |
810 arriving on IRC, since only after both USER and NICK have been | |
811 received from a client does a user become registered. | |
812 | |
813 Between servers USER must to be prefixed with client's NICKname. | |
814 Note that hostname and servername are normally ignored by the IRC | |
815 server when the USER command comes from a directly connected client | |
816 (for security reasons), but they are used in server to server | |
817 communication. This means that a NICK must always be sent to a | |
818 remote server when a new user is being introduced to the rest of the | |
819 network before the accompanying USER is sent. | |
820 | |
821 It must be noted that realname parameter must be the last parameter, | |
822 because it may contain space characters and must be prefixed with a | |
823 colon (':') to make sure this is recognised as such. | |
824 | |
825 Since it is easy for a client to lie about its username by relying | |
826 solely on the USER message, the use of an "Identity Server" is | |
827 recommended. If the host which a user connects from has such a | |
828 server enabled the username is set to that as in the reply from the | |
829 "Identity Server". | |
830 | |
831 Numeric Replies: | |
832 | |
833 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED | |
834 | |
835 Examples: | |
836 | |
837 | |
838 USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan | |
839 | |
840 | |
841 | |
842 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 15] | |
843 | |
844 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
845 | |
846 | |
847 ; User registering themselves with a | |
848 username of "guest" and real name | |
849 "Ronnie Reagan". | |
850 | |
851 | |
852 :testnick USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan | |
853 ; message between servers with the | |
854 nickname for which the USER command | |
855 belongs to | |
856 | |
857 4.1.4 Server message | |
858 | |
859 Command: SERVER | |
860 Parameters: <servername> <hopcount> <info> | |
861 | |
862 The server message is used to tell a server that the other end of a | |
863 new connection is a server. This message is also used to pass server | |
864 data over whole net. When a new server is connected to net, | |
865 information about it be broadcast to the whole network. <hopcount> | |
866 is used to give all servers some internal information on how far away | |
867 all servers are. With a full server list, it would be possible to | |
868 construct a map of the entire server tree, but hostmasks prevent this | |
869 from being done. | |
870 | |
871 The SERVER message must only be accepted from either (a) a connection | |
872 which is yet to be registered and is attempting to register as a | |
873 server, or (b) an existing connection to another server, in which | |
874 case the SERVER message is introducing a new server behind that | |
875 server. | |
876 | |
877 Most errors that occur with the receipt of a SERVER command result in | |
878 the connection being terminated by the destination host (target | |
879 SERVER). Error replies are usually sent using the "ERROR" command | |
880 rather than the numeric since the ERROR command has several useful | |
881 properties which make it useful here. | |
882 | |
883 If a SERVER message is parsed and attempts to introduce a server | |
884 which is already known to the receiving server, the connection from | |
885 which that message must be closed (following the correct procedures), | |
886 since a duplicate route to a server has formed and the acyclic nature | |
887 of the IRC tree broken. | |
888 | |
889 Numeric Replies: | |
890 | |
891 ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED | |
892 | |
893 Example: | |
894 | |
895 | |
896 | |
897 | |
898 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 16] | |
899 | |
900 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
901 | |
902 | |
903 SERVER test.oulu.fi 1 :[tolsun.oulu.fi] Experimental server | |
904 ; New server test.oulu.fi introducing | |
905 itself and attempting to register. The | |
906 name in []'s is the hostname for the | |
907 host running test.oulu.fi. | |
908 | |
909 | |
910 :tolsun.oulu.fi SERVER csd.bu.edu 5 :BU Central Server | |
911 ; Server tolsun.oulu.fi is our uplink | |
912 for csd.bu.edu which is 5 hops away. | |
913 | |
914 4.1.5 Oper | |
915 | |
916 Command: OPER | |
917 Parameters: <user> <password> | |
918 | |
919 OPER message is used by a normal user to obtain operator privileges. | |
920 The combination of <user> and <password> are required to gain | |
921 Operator privileges. | |
922 | |
923 If the client sending the OPER command supplies the correct password | |
924 for the given user, the server then informs the rest of the network | |
925 of the new operator by issuing a "MODE +o" for the clients nickname. | |
926 | |
927 The OPER message is client-server only. | |
928 | |
929 Numeric Replies: | |
930 | |
931 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_YOUREOPER | |
932 ERR_NOOPERHOST ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH | |
933 | |
934 Example: | |
935 | |
936 OPER foo bar ; Attempt to register as an operator | |
937 using a username of "foo" and "bar" as | |
938 the password. | |
939 | |
940 4.1.6 Quit | |
941 | |
942 Command: QUIT | |
943 Parameters: [<Quit message>] | |
944 | |
945 A client session is ended with a quit message. The server must close | |
946 the connection to a client which sends a QUIT message. If a "Quit | |
947 Message" is given, this will be sent instead of the default message, | |
948 the nickname. | |
949 | |
950 When netsplits (disconnecting of two servers) occur, the quit message | |
951 | |
952 | |
953 | |
954 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 17] | |
955 | |
956 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
957 | |
958 | |
959 is composed of the names of two servers involved, separated by a | |
960 space. The first name is that of the server which is still connected | |
961 and the second name is that of the server that has become | |
962 disconnected. | |
963 | |
964 If, for some other reason, a client connection is closed without the | |
965 client issuing a QUIT command (e.g. client dies and EOF occurs | |
966 on socket), the server is required to fill in the quit message with | |
967 some sort of message reflecting the nature of the event which | |
968 caused it to happen. | |
969 | |
970 Numeric Replies: | |
971 | |
972 None. | |
973 | |
974 Examples: | |
975 | |
976 QUIT :Gone to have lunch ; Preferred message format. | |
977 | |
978 4.1.7 Server quit message | |
979 | |
980 Command: SQUIT | |
981 Parameters: <server> <comment> | |
982 | |
983 The SQUIT message is needed to tell about quitting or dead servers. | |
984 If a server wishes to break the connection to another server it must | |
985 send a SQUIT message to the other server, using the the name of the | |
986 other server as the server parameter, which then closes its | |
987 connection to the quitting server. | |
988 | |
989 This command is also available operators to help keep a network of | |
990 IRC servers connected in an orderly fashion. Operators may also | |
991 issue an SQUIT message for a remote server connection. In this case, | |
992 the SQUIT must be parsed by each server inbetween the operator and | |
993 the remote server, updating the view of the network held by each | |
994 server as explained below. | |
995 | |
996 The <comment> should be supplied by all operators who execute a SQUIT | |
997 for a remote server (that is not connected to the server they are | |
998 currently on) so that other operators are aware for the reason of | |
999 this action. The <comment> is also filled in by servers which may | |
1000 place an error or similar message here. | |
1001 | |
1002 Both of the servers which are on either side of the connection being | |
1003 closed are required to to send out a SQUIT message (to all its other | |
1004 server connections) for all other servers which are considered to be | |
1005 behind that link. | |
1006 | |
1007 | |
1008 | |
1009 | |
1010 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 18] | |
1011 | |
1012 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1013 | |
1014 | |
1015 Similarly, a QUIT message must be sent to the other connected servers | |
1016 rest of the network on behalf of all clients behind that link. In | |
1017 addition to this, all channel members of a channel which lost a | |
1018 member due to the split must be sent a QUIT message. | |
1019 | |
1020 If a server connection is terminated prematurely (e.g. the server on | |
1021 the other end of the link died), the server which detects | |
1022 this disconnection is required to inform the rest of the network | |
1023 that the connection has closed and fill in the comment field | |
1024 with something appropriate. | |
1025 | |
1026 Numeric replies: | |
1027 | |
1028 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1029 | |
1030 Example: | |
1031 | |
1032 SQUIT tolsun.oulu.fi :Bad Link ? ; the server link tolson.oulu.fi has | |
1033 been terminated because of "Bad Link". | |
1034 | |
1035 :Trillian SQUIT cm22.eng.umd.edu :Server out of control | |
1036 ; message from Trillian to disconnect | |
1037 "cm22.eng.umd.edu" from the net | |
1038 because "Server out of control". | |
1039 | |
1040 4.2 Channel operations | |
1041 | |
1042 This group of messages is concerned with manipulating channels, their | |
1043 properties (channel modes), and their contents (typically clients). | |
1044 In implementing these, a number of race conditions are inevitable | |
1045 when clients at opposing ends of a network send commands which will | |
1046 ultimately clash. It is also required that servers keep a nickname | |
1047 history to ensure that wherever a <nick> parameter is given, the | |
1048 server check its history in case it has recently been changed. | |
1049 | |
1050 4.2.1 Join message | |
1051 | |
1052 Command: JOIN | |
1053 Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>} [<key>{,<key>}] | |
1054 | |
1055 The JOIN command is used by client to start listening a specific | |
1056 channel. Whether or not a client is allowed to join a channel is | |
1057 checked only by the server the client is connected to; all other | |
1058 servers automatically add the user to the channel when it is received | |
1059 from other servers. The conditions which affect this are as follows: | |
1060 | |
1061 1. the user must be invited if the channel is invite-only; | |
1062 | |
1063 | |
1064 | |
1065 | |
1066 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 19] | |
1067 | |
1068 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1069 | |
1070 | |
1071 2. the user's nick/username/hostname must not match any | |
1072 active bans; | |
1073 | |
1074 3. the correct key (password) must be given if it is set. | |
1075 | |
1076 These are discussed in more detail under the MODE command (see | |
1077 section 4.2.3 for more details). | |
1078 | |
1079 Once a user has joined a channel, they receive notice about all | |
1080 commands their server receives which affect the channel. This | |
1081 includes MODE, KICK, PART, QUIT and of course PRIVMSG/NOTICE. The | |
1082 JOIN command needs to be broadcast to all servers so that each server | |
1083 knows where to find the users who are on the channel. This allows | |
1084 optimal delivery of PRIVMSG/NOTICE messages to the channel. | |
1085 | |
1086 If a JOIN is successful, the user is then sent the channel's topic | |
1087 (using RPL_TOPIC) and the list of users who are on the channel (using | |
1088 RPL_NAMREPLY), which must include the user joining. | |
1089 | |
1090 Numeric Replies: | |
1091 | |
1092 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN | |
1093 ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN ERR_BADCHANNELKEY | |
1094 ERR_CHANNELISFULL ERR_BADCHANMASK | |
1095 ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS | |
1096 RPL_TOPIC | |
1097 | |
1098 Examples: | |
1099 | |
1100 JOIN #foobar ; join channel #foobar. | |
1101 | |
1102 JOIN &foo fubar ; join channel &foo using key "fubar". | |
1103 | |
1104 JOIN #foo,&bar fubar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar" | |
1105 and &bar using no key. | |
1106 | |
1107 JOIN #foo,#bar fubar,foobar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar". | |
1108 and channel #bar using key "foobar". | |
1109 | |
1110 JOIN #foo,#bar ; join channels #foo and #bar. | |
1111 | |
1112 :WiZ JOIN #Twilight_zone ; JOIN message from WiZ | |
1113 | |
1114 4.2.2 Part message | |
1115 | |
1116 Command: PART | |
1117 Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>} | |
1118 | |
1119 | |
1120 | |
1121 | |
1122 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 20] | |
1123 | |
1124 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1125 | |
1126 | |
1127 The PART message causes the client sending the message to be removed | |
1128 from the list of active users for all given channels listed in the | |
1129 parameter string. | |
1130 | |
1131 Numeric Replies: | |
1132 | |
1133 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL | |
1134 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL | |
1135 | |
1136 Examples: | |
1137 | |
1138 PART #twilight_zone ; leave channel "#twilight_zone" | |
1139 | |
1140 PART #oz-ops,&group5 ; leave both channels "&group5" and | |
1141 "#oz-ops". | |
1142 | |
1143 4.2.3 Mode message | |
1144 | |
1145 Command: MODE | |
1146 | |
1147 The MODE command is a dual-purpose command in IRC. It allows both | |
1148 usernames and channels to have their mode changed. The rationale for | |
1149 this choice is that one day nicknames will be obsolete and the | |
1150 equivalent property will be the channel. | |
1151 | |
1152 When parsing MODE messages, it is recommended that the entire message | |
1153 be parsed first and then the changes which resulted then passed on. | |
1154 | |
1155 4.2.3.1 Channel modes | |
1156 | |
1157 Parameters: <channel> {[+|-]|o|p|s|i|t|n|b|v} [<limit>] [<user>] | |
1158 [<ban mask>] | |
1159 | |
1160 The MODE command is provided so that channel operators may change the | |
1161 characteristics of `their' channel. It is also required that servers | |
1162 be able to change channel modes so that channel operators may be | |
1163 created. | |
1164 | |
1165 The various modes available for channels are as follows: | |
1166 | |
1167 o - give/take channel operator privileges; | |
1168 p - private channel flag; | |
1169 s - secret channel flag; | |
1170 i - invite-only channel flag; | |
1171 t - topic settable by channel operator only flag; | |
1172 n - no messages to channel from clients on the outside; | |
1173 m - moderated channel; | |
1174 l - set the user limit to channel; | |
1175 | |
1176 | |
1177 | |
1178 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 21] | |
1179 | |
1180 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1181 | |
1182 | |
1183 b - set a ban mask to keep users out; | |
1184 v - give/take the ability to speak on a moderated channel; | |
1185 k - set a channel key (password). | |
1186 | |
1187 When using the 'o' and 'b' options, a restriction on a total of three | |
1188 per mode command has been imposed. That is, any combination of 'o' | |
1189 and | |
1190 | |
1191 4.2.3.2 User modes | |
1192 | |
1193 Parameters: <nickname> {[+|-]|i|w|s|o} | |
1194 | |
1195 The user MODEs are typically changes which affect either how the | |
1196 client is seen by others or what 'extra' messages the client is sent. | |
1197 A user MODE command may only be accepted if both the sender of the | |
1198 message and the nickname given as a parameter are both the same. | |
1199 | |
1200 The available modes are as follows: | |
1201 | |
1202 i - marks a users as invisible; | |
1203 s - marks a user for receipt of server notices; | |
1204 w - user receives wallops; | |
1205 o - operator flag. | |
1206 | |
1207 Additional modes may be available later on. | |
1208 | |
1209 If a user attempts to make themselves an operator using the "+o" | |
1210 flag, the attempt should be ignored. There is no restriction, | |
1211 however, on anyone `deopping' themselves (using "-o"). Numeric | |
1212 Replies: | |
1213 | |
1214 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_CHANNELMODEIS | |
1215 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED ERR_NOSUCHNICK | |
1216 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_KEYSET | |
1217 RPL_BANLIST RPL_ENDOFBANLIST | |
1218 ERR_UNKNOWNMODE ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL | |
1219 | |
1220 ERR_USERSDONTMATCH RPL_UMODEIS | |
1221 ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG | |
1222 | |
1223 Examples: | |
1224 | |
1225 Use of Channel Modes: | |
1226 | |
1227 MODE #Finnish +im ; Makes #Finnish channel moderated and | |
1228 'invite-only'. | |
1229 | |
1230 MODE #Finnish +o Kilroy ; Gives 'chanop' privileges to Kilroy on | |
1231 | |
1232 | |
1233 | |
1234 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 22] | |
1235 | |
1236 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1237 | |
1238 | |
1239 channel #Finnish. | |
1240 | |
1241 MODE #Finnish +v Wiz ; Allow WiZ to speak on #Finnish. | |
1242 | |
1243 MODE #Fins -s ; Removes 'secret' flag from channel | |
1244 #Fins. | |
1245 | |
1246 MODE #42 +k oulu ; Set the channel key to "oulu". | |
1247 | |
1248 MODE #eu-opers +l 10 ; Set the limit for the number of users | |
1249 on channel to 10. | |
1250 | |
1251 MODE &oulu +b ; list ban masks set for channel. | |
1252 | |
1253 MODE &oulu +b *!*@* ; prevent all users from joining. | |
1254 | |
1255 MODE &oulu +b *!*@*.edu ; prevent any user from a hostname | |
1256 matching *.edu from joining. | |
1257 | |
1258 Use of user Modes: | |
1259 | |
1260 :MODE WiZ -w ; turns reception of WALLOPS messages | |
1261 off for WiZ. | |
1262 | |
1263 :Angel MODE Angel +i ; Message from Angel to make themselves | |
1264 invisible. | |
1265 | |
1266 MODE WiZ -o ; WiZ 'deopping' (removing operator | |
1267 status). The plain reverse of this | |
1268 command ("MODE WiZ +o") must not be | |
1269 allowed from users since would bypass | |
1270 the OPER command. | |
1271 | |
1272 4.2.4 Topic message | |
1273 | |
1274 Command: TOPIC | |
1275 Parameters: <channel> [<topic>] | |
1276 | |
1277 The TOPIC message is used to change or view the topic of a channel. | |
1278 The topic for channel <channel> is returned if there is no <topic> | |
1279 given. If the <topic> parameter is present, the topic for that | |
1280 channel will be changed, if the channel modes permit this action. | |
1281 | |
1282 Numeric Replies: | |
1283 | |
1284 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOTONCHANNEL | |
1285 RPL_NOTOPIC RPL_TOPIC | |
1286 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED | |
1287 | |
1288 | |
1289 | |
1290 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 23] | |
1291 | |
1292 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1293 | |
1294 | |
1295 Examples: | |
1296 | |
1297 :Wiz TOPIC #test :New topic ;User Wiz setting the topic. | |
1298 | |
1299 TOPIC #test :another topic ;set the topic on #test to "another | |
1300 topic". | |
1301 | |
1302 TOPIC #test ; check the topic for #test. | |
1303 | |
1304 4.2.5 Names message | |
1305 | |
1306 Command: NAMES | |
1307 Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>}] | |
1308 | |
1309 By using the NAMES command, a user can list all nicknames that are | |
1310 visible to them on any channel that they can see. Channel names | |
1311 which they can see are those which aren't private (+p) or secret (+s) | |
1312 or those which they are actually on. The <channel> parameter | |
1313 specifies which channel(s) to return information about if valid. | |
1314 There is no error reply for bad channel names. | |
1315 | |
1316 If no <channel> parameter is given, a list of all channels and their | |
1317 occupants is returned. At the end of this list, a list of users who | |
1318 are visible but either not on any channel or not on a visible channel | |
1319 are listed as being on `channel' "*". | |
1320 | |
1321 Numerics: | |
1322 | |
1323 RPL_NAMREPLY RPL_ENDOFNAMES | |
1324 | |
1325 Examples: | |
1326 | |
1327 NAMES #twilight_zone,#42 ; list visible users on #twilight_zone | |
1328 and #42 if the channels are visible to | |
1329 you. | |
1330 | |
1331 NAMES ; list all visible channels and users | |
1332 | |
1333 4.2.6 List message | |
1334 | |
1335 Command: LIST | |
1336 Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>} [<server>]] | |
1337 | |
1338 The list message is used to list channels and their topics. If the | |
1339 <channel> parameter is used, only the status of that channel | |
1340 is displayed. Private channels are listed (without their | |
1341 topics) as channel "Prv" unless the client generating the query is | |
1342 actually on that channel. Likewise, secret channels are not listed | |
1343 | |
1344 | |
1345 | |
1346 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 24] | |
1347 | |
1348 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1349 | |
1350 | |
1351 at all unless the client is a member of the channel in question. | |
1352 | |
1353 Numeric Replies: | |
1354 | |
1355 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_LISTSTART | |
1356 RPL_LIST RPL_LISTEND | |
1357 | |
1358 Examples: | |
1359 | |
1360 LIST ; List all channels. | |
1361 | |
1362 LIST #twilight_zone,#42 ; List channels #twilight_zone and #42 | |
1363 | |
1364 4.2.7 Invite message | |
1365 | |
1366 Command: INVITE | |
1367 Parameters: <nickname> <channel> | |
1368 | |
1369 The INVITE message is used to invite users to a channel. The | |
1370 parameter <nickname> is the nickname of the person to be invited to | |
1371 the target channel <channel>. There is no requirement that the | |
1372 channel the target user is being invited to must exist or be a valid | |
1373 channel. To invite a user to a channel which is invite only (MODE | |
1374 +i), the client sending the invite must be recognised as being a | |
1375 channel operator on the given channel. | |
1376 | |
1377 Numeric Replies: | |
1378 | |
1379 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHNICK | |
1380 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_USERONCHANNEL | |
1381 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED | |
1382 RPL_INVITING RPL_AWAY | |
1383 | |
1384 Examples: | |
1385 | |
1386 :Angel INVITE Wiz #Dust ; User Angel inviting WiZ to channel | |
1387 #Dust | |
1388 | |
1389 INVITE Wiz #Twilight_Zone ; Command to invite WiZ to | |
1390 #Twilight_zone | |
1391 | |
1392 4.2.8 Kick command | |
1393 | |
1394 Command: KICK | |
1395 Parameters: <channel> <user> [<comment>] | |
1396 | |
1397 The KICK command can be used to forcibly remove a user from a | |
1398 channel. It 'kicks them out' of the channel (forced PART). | |
1399 | |
1400 | |
1401 | |
1402 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 25] | |
1403 | |
1404 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1405 | |
1406 | |
1407 Only a channel operator may kick another user out of a channel. | |
1408 Each server that receives a KICK message checks that it is valid | |
1409 (ie the sender is actually a channel operator) before removing | |
1410 the victim from the channel. | |
1411 | |
1412 Numeric Replies: | |
1413 | |
1414 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL | |
1415 ERR_BADCHANMASK ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED | |
1416 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL | |
1417 | |
1418 Examples: | |
1419 | |
1420 KICK &Melbourne Matthew ; Kick Matthew from &Melbourne | |
1421 | |
1422 KICK #Finnish John :Speaking English | |
1423 ; Kick John from #Finnish using | |
1424 "Speaking English" as the reason | |
1425 (comment). | |
1426 | |
1427 :WiZ KICK #Finnish John ; KICK message from WiZ to remove John | |
1428 from channel #Finnish | |
1429 | |
1430 NOTE: | |
1431 It is possible to extend the KICK command parameters to the | |
1432 following: | |
1433 | |
1434 <channel>{,<channel>} <user>{,<user>} [<comment>] | |
1435 | |
1436 4.3 Server queries and commands | |
1437 | |
1438 The server query group of commands has been designed to return | |
1439 information about any server which is connected to the network. All | |
1440 servers connected must respond to these queries and respond | |
1441 correctly. Any invalid response (or lack thereof) must be considered | |
1442 a sign of a broken server and it must be disconnected/disabled as | |
1443 soon as possible until the situation is remedied. | |
1444 | |
1445 In these queries, where a parameter appears as "<server>", it will | |
1446 usually mean it can be a nickname or a server or a wildcard name of | |
1447 some sort. For each parameter, however, only one query and set of | |
1448 replies is to be generated. | |
1449 | |
1450 4.3.1 Version message | |
1451 | |
1452 Command: VERSION | |
1453 Parameters: [<server>] | |
1454 | |
1455 | |
1456 | |
1457 | |
1458 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 26] | |
1459 | |
1460 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1461 | |
1462 | |
1463 The VERSION message is used to query the version of the server | |
1464 program. An optional parameter <server> is used to query the version | |
1465 of the server program which a client is not directly connected to. | |
1466 | |
1467 Numeric Replies: | |
1468 | |
1469 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_VERSION | |
1470 | |
1471 Examples: | |
1472 | |
1473 :Wiz VERSION *.se ; message from Wiz to check the version | |
1474 of a server matching "*.se" | |
1475 | |
1476 VERSION tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the version of server | |
1477 "tolsun.oulu.fi". | |
1478 | |
1479 4.3.2 Stats message | |
1480 | |
1481 Command: STATS | |
1482 Parameters: [<query> [<server>]] | |
1483 | |
1484 The stats message is used to query statistics of certain server. If | |
1485 <server> parameter is omitted, only the end of stats reply is sent | |
1486 back. The implementation of this command is highly dependent on the | |
1487 server which replies, although the server must be able to supply | |
1488 information as described by the queries below (or similar). | |
1489 | |
1490 A query may be given by any single letter which is only checked by | |
1491 the destination server (if given as the <server> parameter) and is | |
1492 otherwise passed on by intermediate servers, ignored and unaltered. | |
1493 The following queries are those found in the current IRC | |
1494 implementation and provide a large portion of the setup information | |
1495 for that server. Although these may not be supported in the same way | |
1496 by other versions, all servers should be able to supply a valid reply | |
1497 to a STATS query which is consistent with the reply formats currently | |
1498 used and the purpose of the query. | |
1499 | |
1500 The currently supported queries are: | |
1501 | |
1502 c - returns a list of servers which the server may connect | |
1503 to or allow connections from; | |
1504 h - returns a list of servers which are either forced to be | |
1505 treated as leaves or allowed to act as hubs; | |
1506 i - returns a list of hosts which the server allows a client | |
1507 to connect from; | |
1508 k - returns a list of banned username/hostname combinations | |
1509 for that server; | |
1510 l - returns a list of the server's connections, showing how | |
1511 | |
1512 | |
1513 | |
1514 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 27] | |
1515 | |
1516 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1517 | |
1518 | |
1519 long each connection has been established and the traffic | |
1520 over that connection in bytes and messages for each | |
1521 direction; | |
1522 m - returns a list of commands supported by the server and | |
1523 the usage count for each if the usage count is non zero; | |
1524 o - returns a list of hosts from which normal clients may | |
1525 become operators; | |
1526 y - show Y (Class) lines from server's configuration file; | |
1527 u - returns a string showing how long the server has been up. | |
1528 | |
1529 Numeric Replies: | |
1530 | |
1531 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1532 RPL_STATSCLINE RPL_STATSNLINE | |
1533 RPL_STATSILINE RPL_STATSKLINE | |
1534 RPL_STATSQLINE RPL_STATSLLINE | |
1535 RPL_STATSLINKINFO RPL_STATSUPTIME | |
1536 RPL_STATSCOMMANDS RPL_STATSOLINE | |
1537 RPL_STATSHLINE RPL_ENDOFSTATS | |
1538 | |
1539 Examples: | |
1540 | |
1541 STATS m ; check the command usage for the server | |
1542 you are connected to | |
1543 | |
1544 :Wiz STATS c eff.org ; request by WiZ for C/N line | |
1545 information from server eff.org | |
1546 | |
1547 4.3.3 Links message | |
1548 | |
1549 Command: LINKS | |
1550 Parameters: [[<remote server>] <server mask>] | |
1551 | |
1552 With LINKS, a user can list all servers which are known by the server | |
1553 answering the query. The returned list of servers must match the | |
1554 mask, or if no mask is given, the full list is returned. | |
1555 | |
1556 If <remote server> is given in addition to <server mask>, the LINKS | |
1557 command is forwarded to the first server found that matches that name | |
1558 (if any), and that server is then required to answer the query. | |
1559 | |
1560 Numeric Replies: | |
1561 | |
1562 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1563 RPL_LINKS RPL_ENDOFLINKS | |
1564 | |
1565 Examples: | |
1566 | |
1567 | |
1568 | |
1569 | |
1570 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 28] | |
1571 | |
1572 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1573 | |
1574 | |
1575 LINKS *.au ; list all servers which have a name | |
1576 that matches *.au; | |
1577 | |
1578 :WiZ LINKS *.bu.edu *.edu ; LINKS message from WiZ to the first | |
1579 server matching *.edu for a list of | |
1580 servers matching *.bu.edu. | |
1581 | |
1582 4.3.4 Time message | |
1583 | |
1584 Command: TIME | |
1585 Parameters: [<server>] | |
1586 | |
1587 The time message is used to query local time from the specified | |
1588 server. If the server parameter is not given, the server handling the | |
1589 command must reply to the query. | |
1590 | |
1591 Numeric Replies: | |
1592 | |
1593 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_TIME | |
1594 | |
1595 Examples: | |
1596 | |
1597 TIME tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the time on the server | |
1598 "tolson.oulu.fi" | |
1599 | |
1600 Angel TIME *.au ; user angel checking the time on a | |
1601 server matching "*.au" | |
1602 | |
1603 4.3.5 Connect message | |
1604 | |
1605 Command: CONNECT | |
1606 Parameters: <target server> [<port> [<remote server>]] | |
1607 | |
1608 The CONNECT command can be used to force a server to try to establish | |
1609 a new connection to another server immediately. CONNECT is a | |
1610 privileged command and is to be available only to IRC Operators. If | |
1611 a remote server is given then the CONNECT attempt is made by that | |
1612 server to <target server> and <port>. | |
1613 | |
1614 Numeric Replies: | |
1615 | |
1616 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NOPRIVILEGES | |
1617 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS | |
1618 | |
1619 Examples: | |
1620 | |
1621 CONNECT tolsun.oulu.fi ; Attempt to connect a server to | |
1622 tolsun.oulu.fi | |
1623 | |
1624 | |
1625 | |
1626 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 29] | |
1627 | |
1628 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1629 | |
1630 | |
1631 :WiZ CONNECT eff.org 6667 csd.bu.edu | |
1632 ; CONNECT attempt by WiZ to get servers | |
1633 eff.org and csd.bu.edu connected on port | |
1634 6667. | |
1635 | |
1636 4.3.6 Trace message | |
1637 | |
1638 Command: TRACE | |
1639 Parameters: [<server>] | |
1640 | |
1641 TRACE command is used to find the route to specific server. Each | |
1642 server that processes this message must tell the sender about it by | |
1643 sending a reply indicating it is a pass-through link, forming a chain | |
1644 of replies similar to that gained from using "traceroute". After | |
1645 sending this reply back, it must then send the TRACE message to the | |
1646 next server until given server is reached. If the <server> parameter | |
1647 is omitted, it is recommended that TRACE command send a message to | |
1648 the sender telling which servers the current server has direct | |
1649 connection to. | |
1650 | |
1651 If the destination given by "<server>" is an actual server, then the | |
1652 destination server is required to report all servers and users which | |
1653 are connected to it, although only operators are permitted to see | |
1654 users present. If the destination given by <server> is a nickname, | |
1655 they only a reply for that nickname is given. | |
1656 | |
1657 Numeric Replies: | |
1658 | |
1659 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1660 | |
1661 If the TRACE message is destined for another server, all intermediate | |
1662 servers must return a RPL_TRACELINK reply to indicate that the TRACE | |
1663 passed through it and where its going next. | |
1664 | |
1665 RPL_TRACELINK | |
1666 A TRACE reply may be composed of any number of the following numeric | |
1667 replies. | |
1668 | |
1669 RPL_TRACECONNECTING RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE | |
1670 RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN RPL_TRACEOPERATOR | |
1671 RPL_TRACEUSER RPL_TRACESERVER | |
1672 RPL_TRACESERVICE RPL_TRACENEWTYPE | |
1673 RPL_TRACECLASS | |
1674 | |
1675 Examples: | |
1676 | |
1677 TRACE *.oulu.fi ; TRACE to a server matching *.oulu.fi | |
1678 | |
1679 | |
1680 | |
1681 | |
1682 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 30] | |
1683 | |
1684 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1685 | |
1686 | |
1687 :WiZ TRACE AngelDust ; TRACE issued by WiZ to nick AngelDust | |
1688 | |
1689 4.3.7 Admin command | |
1690 | |
1691 Command: ADMIN | |
1692 Parameters: [<server>] | |
1693 | |
1694 The admin message is used to find the name of the administrator of | |
1695 the given server, or current server if <server> parameter is omitted. | |
1696 Each server must have the ability to forward ADMIN messages to other | |
1697 servers. | |
1698 | |
1699 Numeric Replies: | |
1700 | |
1701 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1702 RPL_ADMINME RPL_ADMINLOC1 | |
1703 RPL_ADMINLOC2 RPL_ADMINEMAIL | |
1704 | |
1705 Examples: | |
1706 | |
1707 ADMIN tolsun.oulu.fi ; request an ADMIN reply from | |
1708 tolsun.oulu.fi | |
1709 | |
1710 :WiZ ADMIN *.edu ; ADMIN request from WiZ for first | |
1711 server found to match *.edu. | |
1712 | |
1713 4.3.8 Info command | |
1714 | |
1715 Command: INFO | |
1716 Parameters: [<server>] | |
1717 | |
1718 The INFO command is required to return information which describes | |
1719 the server: its version, when it was compiled, the patchlevel, when | |
1720 it was started, and any other miscellaneous information which may be | |
1721 considered to be relevant. | |
1722 | |
1723 Numeric Replies: | |
1724 | |
1725 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1726 RPL_INFO RPL_ENDOFINFO | |
1727 | |
1728 Examples: | |
1729 | |
1730 INFO csd.bu.edu ; request an INFO reply from | |
1731 csd.bu.edu | |
1732 | |
1733 :Avalon INFO *.fi ; INFO request from Avalon for first | |
1734 server found to match *.fi. | |
1735 | |
1736 | |
1737 | |
1738 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 31] | |
1739 | |
1740 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1741 | |
1742 | |
1743 INFO Angel ; request info from the server that | |
1744 Angel is connected to. | |
1745 | |
1746 4.4 Sending messages | |
1747 | |
1748 The main purpose of the IRC protocol is to provide a base for clients | |
1749 to communicate with each other. PRIVMSG and NOTICE are the only | |
1750 messages available which actually perform delivery of a text message | |
1751 from one client to another - the rest just make it possible and try | |
1752 to ensure it happens in a reliable and structured manner. | |
1753 | |
1754 4.4.1 Private messages | |
1755 | |
1756 Command: PRIVMSG | |
1757 Parameters: <receiver>{,<receiver>} <text to be sent> | |
1758 | |
1759 PRIVMSG is used to send private messages between users. <receiver> | |
1760 is the nickname of the receiver of the message. <receiver> can also | |
1761 be a list of names or channels separated with commas. | |
1762 | |
1763 The <receiver> parameter may also me a host mask (#mask) or server | |
1764 mask ($mask). In both cases the server will only send the PRIVMSG | |
1765 to those who have a server or host matching the mask. The mask must | |
1766 have at least 1 (one) "." in it and no wildcards following the | |
1767 last ".". This requirement exists to prevent people sending messages | |
1768 to "#*" or "$*", which would broadcast to all users; from | |
1769 experience, this is abused more than used responsibly and properly. | |
1770 Wildcards are the '*' and '?' characters. This extension to | |
1771 the PRIVMSG command is only available to Operators. | |
1772 | |
1773 Numeric Replies: | |
1774 | |
1775 ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND | |
1776 ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN ERR_NOTOPLEVEL | |
1777 ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS | |
1778 ERR_NOSUCHNICK | |
1779 RPL_AWAY | |
1780 | |
1781 Examples: | |
1782 | |
1783 :Angel PRIVMSG Wiz :Hello are you receiving this message ? | |
1784 ; Message from Angel to Wiz. | |
1785 | |
1786 PRIVMSG Angel :yes I'm receiving it !receiving it !'u>(768u+1n) .br ; | |
1787 Message to Angel. | |
1788 | |
1789 PRIVMSG jto@tolsun.oulu.fi :Hello ! | |
1790 ; Message to a client on server | |
1791 | |
1792 | |
1793 | |
1794 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 32] | |
1795 | |
1796 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1797 | |
1798 | |
1799 tolsun.oulu.fi with username of "jto". | |
1800 | |
1801 PRIVMSG $*.fi :Server tolsun.oulu.fi rebooting. | |
1802 ; Message to everyone on a server which | |
1803 has a name matching *.fi. | |
1804 | |
1805 PRIVMSG #*.edu :NSFNet is undergoing work, expect interruptions | |
1806 ; Message to all users who come from a | |
1807 host which has a name matching *.edu. | |
1808 | |
1809 4.4.2 Notice | |
1810 | |
1811 Command: NOTICE | |
1812 Parameters: <nickname> <text> | |
1813 | |
1814 The NOTICE message is used similarly to PRIVMSG. The difference | |
1815 between NOTICE and PRIVMSG is that automatic replies must never be | |
1816 sent in response to a NOTICE message. This rule applies to servers | |
1817 too - they must not send any error reply back to the client on | |
1818 receipt of a notice. The object of this rule is to avoid loops | |
1819 between a client automatically sending something in response to | |
1820 something it received. This is typically used by automatons (clients | |
1821 with either an AI or other interactive program controlling their | |
1822 actions) which are always seen to be replying lest they end up in a | |
1823 loop with another automaton. | |
1824 | |
1825 See PRIVMSG for more details on replies and examples. | |
1826 | |
1827 4.5 User based queries | |
1828 | |
1829 User queries are a group of commands which are primarily concerned | |
1830 with finding details on a particular user or group users. When using | |
1831 wildcards with any of these commands, if they match, they will only | |
1832 return information on users who are 'visible' to you. The visibility | |
1833 of a user is determined as a combination of the user's mode and the | |
1834 common set of channels you are both on. | |
1835 | |
1836 4.5.1 Who query | |
1837 | |
1838 Command: WHO | |
1839 Parameters: [<name> [<o>]] | |
1840 | |
1841 The WHO message is used by a client to generate a query which returns | |
1842 a list of information which 'matches' the <name> parameter given by | |
1843 the client. In the absence of the <name> parameter, all visible | |
1844 (users who aren't invisible (user mode +i) and who don't have a | |
1845 common channel with the requesting client) are listed. The same | |
1846 result can be achieved by using a <name> of "0" or any wildcard which | |
1847 | |
1848 | |
1849 | |
1850 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 33] | |
1851 | |
1852 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1853 | |
1854 | |
1855 will end up matching every entry possible. | |
1856 | |
1857 The <name> passed to WHO is matched against users' host, server, real | |
1858 name and nickname if the channel <name> cannot be found. | |
1859 | |
1860 If the "o" parameter is passed only operators are returned according | |
1861 to the name mask supplied. | |
1862 | |
1863 Numeric Replies: | |
1864 | |
1865 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
1866 RPL_WHOREPLY RPL_ENDOFWHO | |
1867 | |
1868 Examples: | |
1869 | |
1870 WHO *.fi ; List all users who match against | |
1871 "*.fi". | |
1872 | |
1873 WHO jto* o ; List all users with a match against | |
1874 "jto*" if they are an operator. | |
1875 | |
1876 4.5.2 Whois query | |
1877 | |
1878 Command: WHOIS | |
1879 Parameters: [<server>] <nickmask>[,<nickmask>[,...]] | |
1880 | |
1881 This message is used to query information about particular user. The | |
1882 server will answer this message with several numeric messages | |
1883 indicating different statuses of each user which matches the nickmask | |
1884 (if you are entitled to see them). If no wildcard is present in the | |
1885 <nickmask>, any information about that nick which you are allowed to | |
1886 see is presented. A comma (',') separated list of nicknames may be | |
1887 given. | |
1888 | |
1889 The latter version sends the query to a specific server. It is | |
1890 useful if you want to know how long the user in question has been | |
1891 idle as only local server (ie. the server the user is directly | |
1892 connected to) knows that information, while everything else is | |
1893 globally known. | |
1894 | |
1895 Numeric Replies: | |
1896 | |
1897 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN | |
1898 RPL_WHOISUSER RPL_WHOISCHANNELS | |
1899 RPL_WHOISCHANNELS RPL_WHOISSERVER | |
1900 RPL_AWAY RPL_WHOISOPERATOR | |
1901 RPL_WHOISIDLE ERR_NOSUCHNICK | |
1902 RPL_ENDOFWHOIS | |
1903 | |
1904 | |
1905 | |
1906 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 34] | |
1907 | |
1908 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1909 | |
1910 | |
1911 Examples: | |
1912 | |
1913 WHOIS wiz ; return available user information | |
1914 about nick WiZ | |
1915 | |
1916 WHOIS eff.org trillian ; ask server eff.org for user | |
1917 information about trillian | |
1918 | |
1919 4.5.3 Whowas | |
1920 | |
1921 Command: WHOWAS | |
1922 Parameters: <nickname> [<count> [<server>]] | |
1923 | |
1924 Whowas asks for information about a nickname which no longer exists. | |
1925 This may either be due to a nickname change or the user leaving IRC. | |
1926 In response to this query, the server searches through its nickname | |
1927 history, looking for any nicks which are lexically the same (no wild | |
1928 card matching here). The history is searched backward, returning the | |
1929 most recent entry first. If there are multiple entries, up to | |
1930 <count> replies will be returned (or all of them if no <count> | |
1931 parameter is given). If a non-positive number is passed as being | |
1932 <count>, then a full search is done. | |
1933 | |
1934 Numeric Replies: | |
1935 | |
1936 ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK | |
1937 RPL_WHOWASUSER RPL_WHOISSERVER | |
1938 RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS | |
1939 | |
1940 Examples: | |
1941 | |
1942 WHOWAS Wiz ; return all information in the nick | |
1943 history about nick "WiZ"; | |
1944 | |
1945 WHOWAS Mermaid 9 ; return at most, the 9 most recent | |
1946 entries in the nick history for | |
1947 "Mermaid"; | |
1948 | |
1949 WHOWAS Trillian 1 *.edu ; return the most recent history for | |
1950 "Trillian" from the first server found | |
1951 to match "*.edu". | |
1952 | |
1953 4.6 Miscellaneous messages | |
1954 | |
1955 Messages in this category do not fit into any of the above categories | |
1956 but are nonetheless still a part of and required by the protocol. | |
1957 | |
1958 | |
1959 | |
1960 | |
1961 | |
1962 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 35] | |
1963 | |
1964 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
1965 | |
1966 | |
1967 4.6.1 Kill message | |
1968 | |
1969 Command: KILL | |
1970 Parameters: <nickname> <comment> | |
1971 | |
1972 The KILL message is used to cause a client-server connection to be | |
1973 closed by the server which has the actual connection. KILL is used | |
1974 by servers when they encounter a duplicate entry in the list of valid | |
1975 nicknames and is used to remove both entries. It is also available | |
1976 to operators. | |
1977 | |
1978 Clients which have automatic reconnect algorithms effectively make | |
1979 this command useless since the disconnection is only brief. It does | |
1980 however break the flow of data and can be used to stop large amounts | |
1981 of being abused, any user may elect to receive KILL messages | |
1982 generated for others to keep an 'eye' on would be trouble spots. | |
1983 | |
1984 In an arena where nicknames are required to be globally unique at all | |
1985 times, KILL messages are sent whenever 'duplicates' are detected | |
1986 (that is an attempt to register two users with the same nickname) in | |
1987 the hope that both of them will disappear and only 1 reappear. | |
1988 | |
1989 The comment given must reflect the actual reason for the KILL. For | |
1990 server-generated KILLs it usually is made up of details concerning | |
1991 the origins of the two conflicting nicknames. For users it is left | |
1992 up to them to provide an adequate reason to satisfy others who see | |
1993 it. To prevent/discourage fake KILLs from being generated to hide | |
1994 the identify of the KILLer, the comment also shows a 'kill-path' | |
1995 which is updated by each server it passes through, each prepending | |
1996 its name to the path. | |
1997 | |
1998 Numeric Replies: | |
1999 | |
2000 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS | |
2001 ERR_NOSUCHNICK ERR_CANTKILLSERVER | |
2002 | |
2003 | |
2004 KILL David (csd.bu.edu <- tolsun.oulu.fi) | |
2005 ; Nickname collision between csd.bu.edu | |
2006 and tolson.oulu.fi | |
2007 | |
2008 | |
2009 NOTE: | |
2010 It is recommended that only Operators be allowed to kill other users | |
2011 with KILL message. In an ideal world not even operators would need | |
2012 to do this and it would be left to servers to deal with. | |
2013 | |
2014 | |
2015 | |
2016 | |
2017 | |
2018 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 36] | |
2019 | |
2020 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2021 | |
2022 | |
2023 4.6.2 Ping message | |
2024 | |
2025 Command: PING | |
2026 Parameters: <server1> [<server2>] | |
2027 | |
2028 The PING message is used to test the presence of an active client at | |
2029 the other end of the connection. A PING message is sent at regular | |
2030 intervals if no other activity detected coming from a connection. If | |
2031 a connection fails to respond to a PING command within a set amount | |
2032 of time, that connection is closed. | |
2033 | |
2034 Any client which receives a PING message must respond to <server1> | |
2035 (server which sent the PING message out) as quickly as possible with | |
2036 an appropriate PONG message to indicate it is still there and alive. | |
2037 Servers should not respond to PING commands but rely on PINGs from | |
2038 the other end of the connection to indicate the connection is alive. | |
2039 If the <server2> parameter is specified, the PING message gets | |
2040 forwarded there. | |
2041 | |
2042 Numeric Replies: | |
2043 | |
2044 ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
2045 | |
2046 Examples: | |
2047 | |
2048 PING tolsun.oulu.fi ; server sending a PING message to | |
2049 another server to indicate it is still | |
2050 alive. | |
2051 | |
2052 PING WiZ ; PING message being sent to nick WiZ | |
2053 | |
2054 4.6.3 Pong message | |
2055 | |
2056 Command: PONG | |
2057 Parameters: <daemon> [<daemon2>] | |
2058 | |
2059 PONG message is a reply to ping message. If parameter <daemon2> is | |
2060 given this message must be forwarded to given daemon. The <daemon> | |
2061 parameter is the name of the daemon who has responded to PING message | |
2062 and generated this message. | |
2063 | |
2064 Numeric Replies: | |
2065 | |
2066 ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
2067 | |
2068 Examples: | |
2069 | |
2070 PONG csd.bu.edu tolsun.oulu.fi ; PONG message from csd.bu.edu to | |
2071 | |
2072 | |
2073 | |
2074 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 37] | |
2075 | |
2076 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2077 | |
2078 | |
2079 tolsun.oulu.fi | |
2080 | |
2081 4.6.4 Error | |
2082 | |
2083 Command: ERROR | |
2084 Parameters: <error message> | |
2085 | |
2086 The ERROR command is for use by servers when reporting a serious or | |
2087 fatal error to its operators. It may also be sent from one server to | |
2088 another but must not be accepted from any normal unknown clients. | |
2089 | |
2090 An ERROR message is for use for reporting errors which occur with a | |
2091 server-to-server link only. An ERROR message is sent to the server | |
2092 at the other end (which sends it to all of its connected operators) | |
2093 and to all operators currently connected. It is not to be passed | |
2094 onto any other servers by a server if it is received from a server. | |
2095 | |
2096 When a server sends a received ERROR message to its operators, the | |
2097 message should be encapsulated inside a NOTICE message, indicating | |
2098 that the client was not responsible for the error. | |
2099 | |
2100 Numerics: | |
2101 | |
2102 None. | |
2103 | |
2104 Examples: | |
2105 | |
2106 ERROR :Server *.fi already exists; ERROR message to the other server | |
2107 which caused this error. | |
2108 | |
2109 NOTICE WiZ :ERROR from csd.bu.edu -- Server *.fi already exists | |
2110 ; Same ERROR message as above but sent | |
2111 to user WiZ on the other server. | |
2112 | |
2113 5. OPTIONALS | |
2114 | |
2115 This section describes OPTIONAL messages. They are not required in a | |
2116 working server implementation of the protocol described herein. In | |
2117 the absence of the option, an error reply message must be generated | |
2118 or an unknown command error. If the message is destined for another | |
2119 server to answer then it must be passed on (elementary parsing | |
2120 required) The allocated numerics for this are listed with the | |
2121 messages below. | |
2122 | |
2123 5.1 Away | |
2124 | |
2125 Command: AWAY | |
2126 Parameters: [message] | |
2127 | |
2128 | |
2129 | |
2130 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 38] | |
2131 | |
2132 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2133 | |
2134 | |
2135 With the AWAY message, clients can set an automatic reply string for | |
2136 any PRIVMSG commands directed at them (not to a channel they are on). | |
2137 The automatic reply is sent by the server to client sending the | |
2138 PRIVMSG command. The only replying server is the one to which the | |
2139 sending client is connected to. | |
2140 | |
2141 The AWAY message is used either with one parameter (to set an AWAY | |
2142 message) or with no parameters (to remove the AWAY message). | |
2143 | |
2144 Numeric Replies: | |
2145 | |
2146 RPL_UNAWAY RPL_NOWAWAY | |
2147 | |
2148 Examples: | |
2149 | |
2150 AWAY :Gone to lunch. Back in 5 ; set away message to "Gone to lunch. | |
2151 Back in 5". | |
2152 | |
2153 :WiZ AWAY ; unmark WiZ as being away. | |
2154 | |
2155 | |
2156 5.2 Rehash message | |
2157 | |
2158 Command: REHASH | |
2159 Parameters: None | |
2160 | |
2161 The rehash message can be used by the operator to force the server to | |
2162 re-read and process its configuration file. | |
2163 | |
2164 Numeric Replies: | |
2165 | |
2166 RPL_REHASHING ERR_NOPRIVILEGES | |
2167 | |
2168 Examples: | |
2169 | |
2170 REHASH ; message from client with operator | |
2171 status to server asking it to reread its | |
2172 configuration file. | |
2173 | |
2174 5.3 Restart message | |
2175 | |
2176 Command: RESTART | |
2177 Parameters: None | |
2178 | |
2179 The restart message can only be used by an operator to force a server | |
2180 restart itself. This message is optional since it may be viewed as a | |
2181 risk to allow arbitrary people to connect to a server as an operator | |
2182 and execute this command, causing (at least) a disruption to service. | |
2183 | |
2184 | |
2185 | |
2186 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 39] | |
2187 | |
2188 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2189 | |
2190 | |
2191 The RESTART command must always be fully processed by the server to | |
2192 which the sending client is connected and not be passed onto other | |
2193 connected servers. | |
2194 | |
2195 Numeric Replies: | |
2196 | |
2197 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES | |
2198 | |
2199 Examples: | |
2200 | |
2201 RESTART ; no parameters required. | |
2202 | |
2203 5.4 Summon message | |
2204 | |
2205 Command: SUMMON | |
2206 Parameters: <user> [<server>] | |
2207 | |
2208 The SUMMON command can be used to give users who are on a host | |
2209 running an IRC server a message asking them to please join IRC. This | |
2210 message is only sent if the target server (a) has SUMMON enabled, (b) | |
2211 the user is logged in and (c) the server process can write to the | |
2212 user's tty (or similar). | |
2213 | |
2214 If no <server> parameter is given it tries to summon <user> from the | |
2215 server the client is connected to is assumed as the target. | |
2216 | |
2217 If summon is not enabled in a server, it must return the | |
2218 ERR_SUMMONDISABLED numeric and pass the summon message onwards. | |
2219 | |
2220 Numeric Replies: | |
2221 | |
2222 ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_FILEERROR | |
2223 ERR_NOLOGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
2224 RPL_SUMMONING | |
2225 | |
2226 Examples: | |
2227 | |
2228 SUMMON jto ; summon user jto on the server's host | |
2229 | |
2230 SUMMON jto tolsun.oulu.fi ; summon user jto on the host which a | |
2231 server named "tolsun.oulu.fi" is | |
2232 running. | |
2233 | |
2234 | |
2235 5.5 Users | |
2236 | |
2237 Command: USERS | |
2238 Parameters: [<server>] | |
2239 | |
2240 | |
2241 | |
2242 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 40] | |
2243 | |
2244 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2245 | |
2246 | |
2247 The USERS command returns a list of users logged into the server in a | |
2248 similar format to who(1), rusers(1) and finger(1). Some people | |
2249 may disable this command on their server for security related | |
2250 reasons. If disabled, the correct numeric must be returned to | |
2251 indicate this. | |
2252 | |
2253 Numeric Replies: | |
2254 | |
2255 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_FILEERROR | |
2256 RPL_USERSSTART RPL_USERS | |
2257 RPL_NOUSERS RPL_ENDOFUSERS | |
2258 ERR_USERSDISABLED | |
2259 | |
2260 Disabled Reply: | |
2261 | |
2262 ERR_USERSDISABLED | |
2263 | |
2264 Examples: | |
2265 | |
2266 USERS eff.org ; request a list of users logged in on | |
2267 server eff.org | |
2268 | |
2269 :John USERS tolsun.oulu.fi ; request from John for a list of users | |
2270 logged in on server tolsun.oulu.fi | |
2271 | |
2272 5.6 Operwall message | |
2273 | |
2274 Command: WALLOPS | |
2275 Parameters: Text to be sent to all operators currently online | |
2276 | |
2277 Sends a message to all operators currently online. After | |
2278 implementing WALLOPS as a user command it was found that it was | |
2279 often and commonly abused as a means of sending a message to a lot | |
2280 of people (much similar to WALL). Due to this it is recommended | |
2281 that the current implementation of WALLOPS be used as an | |
2282 example by allowing and recognising only servers as the senders of | |
2283 WALLOPS. | |
2284 | |
2285 Numeric Replies: | |
2286 | |
2287 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS | |
2288 | |
2289 Examples: | |
2290 | |
2291 :csd.bu.edu WALLOPS :Connect '*.uiuc.edu 6667' from Joshua; WALLOPS | |
2292 message from csd.bu.edu announcing a | |
2293 CONNECT message it received and acted | |
2294 upon from Joshua. | |
2295 | |
2296 | |
2297 | |
2298 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 41] | |
2299 | |
2300 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2301 | |
2302 | |
2303 5.7 Userhost message | |
2304 | |
2305 Command: USERHOST | |
2306 Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>} | |
2307 | |
2308 The USERHOST command takes a list of up to 5 nicknames, each | |
2309 separated by a space character and returns a list of information | |
2310 about each nickname that it found. The returned list has each reply | |
2311 separated by a space. | |
2312 | |
2313 Numeric Replies: | |
2314 | |
2315 RPL_USERHOST ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS | |
2316 | |
2317 Examples: | |
2318 | |
2319 USERHOST Wiz Michael Marty p ;USERHOST request for information on | |
2320 nicks "Wiz", "Michael", "Marty" and "p" | |
2321 | |
2322 5.8 Ison message | |
2323 | |
2324 Command: ISON | |
2325 Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>} | |
2326 | |
2327 The ISON command was implemented to provide a quick and efficient | |
2328 means to get a response about whether a given nickname was currently | |
2329 on IRC. ISON only takes one (1) parameter: a space-separated list of | |
2330 nicks. For each nickname in the list that is present, the server | |
2331 adds that to its reply string. Thus the reply string may return | |
2332 empty (none of the given nicks are present), an exact copy of the | |
2333 parameter string (all of them present) or as any other subset of the | |
2334 set of nicks given in the parameter. The only limit on the number | |
2335 of nicks that may be checked is that the combined length must not be | |
2336 too large as to cause the server to chop it off so it fits in 512 | |
2337 characters. | |
2338 | |
2339 ISON is only be processed by the server local to the client sending | |
2340 the command and thus not passed onto other servers for further | |
2341 processing. | |
2342 | |
2343 Numeric Replies: | |
2344 | |
2345 RPL_ISON ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS | |
2346 | |
2347 Examples: | |
2348 | |
2349 ISON phone trillian WiZ jarlek Avalon Angel Monstah | |
2350 ; Sample ISON request for 7 nicks. | |
2351 | |
2352 | |
2353 | |
2354 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 42] | |
2355 | |
2356 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2357 | |
2358 | |
2359 6. REPLIES | |
2360 | |
2361 The following is a list of numeric replies which are generated in | |
2362 response to the commands given above. Each numeric is given with its | |
2363 number, name and reply string. | |
2364 | |
2365 6.1 Error Replies. | |
2366 | |
2367 401 ERR_NOSUCHNICK | |
2368 "<nickname> :No such nick/channel" | |
2369 | |
2370 - Used to indicate the nickname parameter supplied to a | |
2371 command is currently unused. | |
2372 | |
2373 402 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER | |
2374 "<server name> :No such server" | |
2375 | |
2376 - Used to indicate the server name given currently | |
2377 doesn't exist. | |
2378 | |
2379 403 ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL | |
2380 "<channel name> :No such channel" | |
2381 | |
2382 - Used to indicate the given channel name is invalid. | |
2383 | |
2384 404 ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN | |
2385 "<channel name> :Cannot send to channel" | |
2386 | |
2387 - Sent to a user who is either (a) not on a channel | |
2388 which is mode +n or (b) not a chanop (or mode +v) on | |
2389 a channel which has mode +m set and is trying to send | |
2390 a PRIVMSG message to that channel. | |
2391 | |
2392 405 ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS | |
2393 "<channel name> :You have joined too many \ | |
2394 channels" | |
2395 - Sent to a user when they have joined the maximum | |
2396 number of allowed channels and they try to join | |
2397 another channel. | |
2398 | |
2399 406 ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK | |
2400 "<nickname> :There was no such nickname" | |
2401 | |
2402 - Returned by WHOWAS to indicate there is no history | |
2403 information for that nickname. | |
2404 | |
2405 407 ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS | |
2406 "<target> :Duplicate recipients. No message \ | |
2407 | |
2408 | |
2409 | |
2410 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 43] | |
2411 | |
2412 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2413 | |
2414 | |
2415 delivered" | |
2416 | |
2417 - Returned to a client which is attempting to send a | |
2418 PRIVMSG/NOTICE using the user@host destination format | |
2419 and for a user@host which has several occurrences. | |
2420 | |
2421 409 ERR_NOORIGIN | |
2422 ":No origin specified" | |
2423 | |
2424 - PING or PONG message missing the originator parameter | |
2425 which is required since these commands must work | |
2426 without valid prefixes. | |
2427 | |
2428 411 ERR_NORECIPIENT | |
2429 ":No recipient given (<command>)" | |
2430 412 ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND | |
2431 ":No text to send" | |
2432 413 ERR_NOTOPLEVEL | |
2433 "<mask> :No toplevel domain specified" | |
2434 414 ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL | |
2435 "<mask> :Wildcard in toplevel domain" | |
2436 | |
2437 - 412 - 414 are returned by PRIVMSG to indicate that | |
2438 the message wasn't delivered for some reason. | |
2439 ERR_NOTOPLEVEL and ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL are errors that | |
2440 are returned when an invalid use of | |
2441 "PRIVMSG $<server>" or "PRIVMSG #<host>" is attempted. | |
2442 | |
2443 421 ERR_UNKNOWNCOMMAND | |
2444 "<command> :Unknown command" | |
2445 | |
2446 - Returned to a registered client to indicate that the | |
2447 command sent is unknown by the server. | |
2448 | |
2449 422 ERR_NOMOTD | |
2450 ":MOTD File is missing" | |
2451 | |
2452 - Server's MOTD file could not be opened by the server. | |
2453 | |
2454 423 ERR_NOADMININFO | |
2455 "<server> :No administrative info available" | |
2456 | |
2457 - Returned by a server in response to an ADMIN message | |
2458 when there is an error in finding the appropriate | |
2459 information. | |
2460 | |
2461 424 ERR_FILEERROR | |
2462 ":File error doing <file op> on <file>" | |
2463 | |
2464 | |
2465 | |
2466 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 44] | |
2467 | |
2468 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2469 | |
2470 | |
2471 - Generic error message used to report a failed file | |
2472 operation during the processing of a message. | |
2473 | |
2474 431 ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN | |
2475 ":No nickname given" | |
2476 | |
2477 - Returned when a nickname parameter expected for a | |
2478 command and isn't found. | |
2479 | |
2480 432 ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME | |
2481 "<nick> :Erroneus nickname" | |
2482 | |
2483 - Returned after receiving a NICK message which contains | |
2484 characters which do not fall in the defined set. See | |
2485 section x.x.x for details on valid nicknames. | |
2486 | |
2487 433 ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE | |
2488 "<nick> :Nickname is already in use" | |
2489 | |
2490 - Returned when a NICK message is processed that results | |
2491 in an attempt to change to a currently existing | |
2492 nickname. | |
2493 | |
2494 436 ERR_NICKCOLLISION | |
2495 "<nick> :Nickname collision KILL" | |
2496 | |
2497 - Returned by a server to a client when it detects a | |
2498 nickname collision (registered of a NICK that | |
2499 already exists by another server). | |
2500 | |
2501 441 ERR_USERNOTINCHANNEL | |
2502 "<nick> <channel> :They aren't on that channel" | |
2503 | |
2504 - Returned by the server to indicate that the target | |
2505 user of the command is not on the given channel. | |
2506 | |
2507 442 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL | |
2508 "<channel> :You're not on that channel" | |
2509 | |
2510 - Returned by the server whenever a client tries to | |
2511 perform a channel effecting command for which the | |
2512 client isn't a member. | |
2513 | |
2514 443 ERR_USERONCHANNEL | |
2515 "<user> <channel> :is already on channel" | |
2516 | |
2517 - Returned when a client tries to invite a user to a | |
2518 channel they are already on. | |
2519 | |
2520 | |
2521 | |
2522 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 45] | |
2523 | |
2524 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2525 | |
2526 | |
2527 444 ERR_NOLOGIN | |
2528 "<user> :User not logged in" | |
2529 | |
2530 - Returned by the summon after a SUMMON command for a | |
2531 user was unable to be performed since they were not | |
2532 logged in. | |
2533 | |
2534 445 ERR_SUMMONDISABLED | |
2535 ":SUMMON has been disabled" | |
2536 | |
2537 - Returned as a response to the SUMMON command. Must be | |
2538 returned by any server which does not implement it. | |
2539 | |
2540 446 ERR_USERSDISABLED | |
2541 ":USERS has been disabled" | |
2542 | |
2543 - Returned as a response to the USERS command. Must be | |
2544 returned by any server which does not implement it. | |
2545 | |
2546 451 ERR_NOTREGISTERED | |
2547 ":You have not registered" | |
2548 | |
2549 - Returned by the server to indicate that the client | |
2550 must be registered before the server will allow it | |
2551 to be parsed in detail. | |
2552 | |
2553 461 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS | |
2554 "<command> :Not enough parameters" | |
2555 | |
2556 - Returned by the server by numerous commands to | |
2557 indicate to the client that it didn't supply enough | |
2558 parameters. | |
2559 | |
2560 462 ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED | |
2561 ":You may not reregister" | |
2562 | |
2563 - Returned by the server to any link which tries to | |
2564 change part of the registered details (such as | |
2565 password or user details from second USER message). | |
2566 | |
2567 | |
2568 463 ERR_NOPERMFORHOST | |
2569 ":Your host isn't among the privileged" | |
2570 | |
2571 - Returned to a client which attempts to register with | |
2572 a server which does not been setup to allow | |
2573 connections from the host the attempted connection | |
2574 is tried. | |
2575 | |
2576 | |
2577 | |
2578 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 46] | |
2579 | |
2580 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2581 | |
2582 | |
2583 464 ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH | |
2584 ":Password incorrect" | |
2585 | |
2586 - Returned to indicate a failed attempt at registering | |
2587 a connection for which a password was required and | |
2588 was either not given or incorrect. | |
2589 | |
2590 465 ERR_YOUREBANNEDCREEP | |
2591 ":You are banned from this server" | |
2592 | |
2593 - Returned after an attempt to connect and register | |
2594 yourself with a server which has been setup to | |
2595 explicitly deny connections to you. | |
2596 | |
2597 467 ERR_KEYSET | |
2598 "<channel> :Channel key already set" | |
2599 471 ERR_CHANNELISFULL | |
2600 "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+l)" | |
2601 472 ERR_UNKNOWNMODE | |
2602 "<char> :is unknown mode char to me" | |
2603 473 ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN | |
2604 "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+i)" | |
2605 474 ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN | |
2606 "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+b)" | |
2607 475 ERR_BADCHANNELKEY | |
2608 "<channel> :Cannot join channel (+k)" | |
2609 481 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES | |
2610 ":Permission Denied- You're not an IRC operator" | |
2611 | |
2612 - Any command requiring operator privileges to operate | |
2613 must return this error to indicate the attempt was | |
2614 unsuccessful. | |
2615 | |
2616 482 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED | |
2617 "<channel> :You're not channel operator" | |
2618 | |
2619 - Any command requiring 'chanop' privileges (such as | |
2620 MODE messages) must return this error if the client | |
2621 making the attempt is not a chanop on the specified | |
2622 channel. | |
2623 | |
2624 483 ERR_CANTKILLSERVER | |
2625 ":You cant kill a server!" | |
2626 | |
2627 - Any attempts to use the KILL command on a server | |
2628 are to be refused and this error returned directly | |
2629 to the client. | |
2630 | |
2631 | |
2632 | |
2633 | |
2634 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 47] | |
2635 | |
2636 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2637 | |
2638 | |
2639 491 ERR_NOOPERHOST | |
2640 ":No O-lines for your host" | |
2641 | |
2642 - If a client sends an OPER message and the server has | |
2643 not been configured to allow connections from the | |
2644 client's host as an operator, this error must be | |
2645 returned. | |
2646 | |
2647 501 ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG | |
2648 ":Unknown MODE flag" | |
2649 | |
2650 - Returned by the server to indicate that a MODE | |
2651 message was sent with a nickname parameter and that | |
2652 the a mode flag sent was not recognized. | |
2653 | |
2654 502 ERR_USERSDONTMATCH | |
2655 ":Cant change mode for other users" | |
2656 | |
2657 - Error sent to any user trying to view or change the | |
2658 user mode for a user other than themselves. | |
2659 | |
2660 6.2 Command responses. | |
2661 | |
2662 300 RPL_NONE | |
2663 Dummy reply number. Not used. | |
2664 | |
2665 302 RPL_USERHOST | |
2666 ":[<reply>{<space><reply>}]" | |
2667 | |
2668 - Reply format used by USERHOST to list replies to | |
2669 the query list. The reply string is composed as | |
2670 follows: | |
2671 | |
2672 <reply> ::= <nick>['*'] '=' <'+'|'-'><hostname> | |
2673 | |
2674 The '*' indicates whether the client has registered | |
2675 as an Operator. The '-' or '+' characters represent | |
2676 whether the client has set an AWAY message or not | |
2677 respectively. | |
2678 | |
2679 303 RPL_ISON | |
2680 ":[<nick> {<space><nick>}]" | |
2681 | |
2682 - Reply format used by ISON to list replies to the | |
2683 query list. | |
2684 | |
2685 301 RPL_AWAY | |
2686 "<nick> :<away message>" | |
2687 | |
2688 | |
2689 | |
2690 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 48] | |
2691 | |
2692 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2693 | |
2694 | |
2695 305 RPL_UNAWAY | |
2696 ":You are no longer marked as being away" | |
2697 306 RPL_NOWAWAY | |
2698 ":You have been marked as being away" | |
2699 | |
2700 - These replies are used with the AWAY command (if | |
2701 allowed). RPL_AWAY is sent to any client sending a | |
2702 PRIVMSG to a client which is away. RPL_AWAY is only | |
2703 sent by the server to which the client is connected. | |
2704 Replies RPL_UNAWAY and RPL_NOWAWAY are sent when the | |
2705 client removes and sets an AWAY message. | |
2706 | |
2707 311 RPL_WHOISUSER | |
2708 "<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>" | |
2709 312 RPL_WHOISSERVER | |
2710 "<nick> <server> :<server info>" | |
2711 313 RPL_WHOISOPERATOR | |
2712 "<nick> :is an IRC operator" | |
2713 317 RPL_WHOISIDLE | |
2714 "<nick> <integer> :seconds idle" | |
2715 318 RPL_ENDOFWHOIS | |
2716 "<nick> :End of /WHOIS list" | |
2717 319 RPL_WHOISCHANNELS | |
2718 "<nick> :{[@|+]<channel><space>}" | |
2719 | |
2720 - Replies 311 - 313, 317 - 319 are all replies | |
2721 generated in response to a WHOIS message. Given that | |
2722 there are enough parameters present, the answering | |
2723 server must either formulate a reply out of the above | |
2724 numerics (if the query nick is found) or return an | |
2725 error reply. The '*' in RPL_WHOISUSER is there as | |
2726 the literal character and not as a wild card. For | |
2727 each reply set, only RPL_WHOISCHANNELS may appear | |
2728 more than once (for long lists of channel names). | |
2729 The '@' and '+' characters next to the channel name | |
2730 indicate whether a client is a channel operator or | |
2731 has been granted permission to speak on a moderated | |
2732 channel. The RPL_ENDOFWHOIS reply is used to mark | |
2733 the end of processing a WHOIS message. | |
2734 | |
2735 314 RPL_WHOWASUSER | |
2736 "<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>" | |
2737 369 RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS | |
2738 "<nick> :End of WHOWAS" | |
2739 | |
2740 - When replying to a WHOWAS message, a server must use | |
2741 the replies RPL_WHOWASUSER, RPL_WHOISSERVER or | |
2742 ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK for each nickname in the presented | |
2743 | |
2744 | |
2745 | |
2746 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 49] | |
2747 | |
2748 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2749 | |
2750 | |
2751 list. At the end of all reply batches, there must | |
2752 be RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS (even if there was only one reply | |
2753 and it was an error). | |
2754 | |
2755 321 RPL_LISTSTART | |
2756 "Channel :Users Name" | |
2757 322 RPL_LIST | |
2758 "<channel> <# visible> :<topic>" | |
2759 323 RPL_LISTEND | |
2760 ":End of /LIST" | |
2761 | |
2762 - Replies RPL_LISTSTART, RPL_LIST, RPL_LISTEND mark | |
2763 the start, actual replies with data and end of the | |
2764 server's response to a LIST command. If there are | |
2765 no channels available to return, only the start | |
2766 and end reply must be sent. | |
2767 | |
2768 324 RPL_CHANNELMODEIS | |
2769 "<channel> <mode> <mode params>" | |
2770 | |
2771 331 RPL_NOTOPIC | |
2772 "<channel> :No topic is set" | |
2773 332 RPL_TOPIC | |
2774 "<channel> :<topic>" | |
2775 | |
2776 - When sending a TOPIC message to determine the | |
2777 channel topic, one of two replies is sent. If | |
2778 the topic is set, RPL_TOPIC is sent back else | |
2779 RPL_NOTOPIC. | |
2780 | |
2781 341 RPL_INVITING | |
2782 "<channel> <nick>" | |
2783 | |
2784 - Returned by the server to indicate that the | |
2785 attempted INVITE message was successful and is | |
2786 being passed onto the end client. | |
2787 | |
2788 342 RPL_SUMMONING | |
2789 "<user> :Summoning user to IRC" | |
2790 | |
2791 - Returned by a server answering a SUMMON message to | |
2792 indicate that it is summoning that user. | |
2793 | |
2794 351 RPL_VERSION | |
2795 "<version>.<debuglevel> <server> :<comments>" | |
2796 | |
2797 - Reply by the server showing its version details. | |
2798 The <version> is the version of the software being | |
2799 | |
2800 | |
2801 | |
2802 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 50] | |
2803 | |
2804 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2805 | |
2806 | |
2807 used (including any patchlevel revisions) and the | |
2808 <debuglevel> is used to indicate if the server is | |
2809 running in "debug mode". | |
2810 | |
2811 The "comments" field may contain any comments about | |
2812 the version or further version details. | |
2813 | |
2814 352 RPL_WHOREPLY | |
2815 "<channel> <user> <host> <server> <nick> \ | |
2816 <H|G>[*][@|+] :<hopcount> <real name>" | |
2817 315 RPL_ENDOFWHO | |
2818 "<name> :End of /WHO list" | |
2819 | |
2820 - The RPL_WHOREPLY and RPL_ENDOFWHO pair are used | |
2821 to answer a WHO message. The RPL_WHOREPLY is only | |
2822 sent if there is an appropriate match to the WHO | |
2823 query. If there is a list of parameters supplied | |
2824 with a WHO message, a RPL_ENDOFWHO must be sent | |
2825 after processing each list item with <name> being | |
2826 the item. | |
2827 | |
2828 353 RPL_NAMREPLY | |
2829 "<channel> :[[@|+]<nick> [[@|+]<nick> [...]]]" | |
2830 366 RPL_ENDOFNAMES | |
2831 "<channel> :End of /NAMES list" | |
2832 | |
2833 - To reply to a NAMES message, a reply pair consisting | |
2834 of RPL_NAMREPLY and RPL_ENDOFNAMES is sent by the | |
2835 server back to the client. If there is no channel | |
2836 found as in the query, then only RPL_ENDOFNAMES is | |
2837 returned. The exception to this is when a NAMES | |
2838 message is sent with no parameters and all visible | |
2839 channels and contents are sent back in a series of | |
2840 RPL_NAMEREPLY messages with a RPL_ENDOFNAMES to mark | |
2841 the end. | |
2842 | |
2843 364 RPL_LINKS | |
2844 "<mask> <server> :<hopcount> <server info>" | |
2845 365 RPL_ENDOFLINKS | |
2846 "<mask> :End of /LINKS list" | |
2847 | |
2848 - In replying to the LINKS message, a server must send | |
2849 replies back using the RPL_LINKS numeric and mark the | |
2850 end of the list using an RPL_ENDOFLINKS reply. | |
2851 | |
2852 367 RPL_BANLIST | |
2853 "<channel> <banid>" | |
2854 368 RPL_ENDOFBANLIST | |
2855 | |
2856 | |
2857 | |
2858 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 51] | |
2859 | |
2860 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2861 | |
2862 | |
2863 "<channel> :End of channel ban list" | |
2864 | |
2865 - When listing the active 'bans' for a given channel, | |
2866 a server is required to send the list back using the | |
2867 RPL_BANLIST and RPL_ENDOFBANLIST messages. A separate | |
2868 RPL_BANLIST is sent for each active banid. After the | |
2869 banids have been listed (or if none present) a | |
2870 RPL_ENDOFBANLIST must be sent. | |
2871 | |
2872 371 RPL_INFO | |
2873 ":<string>" | |
2874 374 RPL_ENDOFINFO | |
2875 ":End of /INFO list" | |
2876 | |
2877 - A server responding to an INFO message is required to | |
2878 send all its 'info' in a series of RPL_INFO messages | |
2879 with a RPL_ENDOFINFO reply to indicate the end of the | |
2880 replies. | |
2881 | |
2882 375 RPL_MOTDSTART | |
2883 ":- <server> Message of the day - " | |
2884 372 RPL_MOTD | |
2885 ":- <text>" | |
2886 376 RPL_ENDOFMOTD | |
2887 ":End of /MOTD command" | |
2888 | |
2889 - When responding to the MOTD message and the MOTD file | |
2890 is found, the file is displayed line by line, with | |
2891 each line no longer than 80 characters, using | |
2892 RPL_MOTD format replies. These should be surrounded | |
2893 by a RPL_MOTDSTART (before the RPL_MOTDs) and an | |
2894 RPL_ENDOFMOTD (after). | |
2895 | |
2896 381 RPL_YOUREOPER | |
2897 ":You are now an IRC operator" | |
2898 | |
2899 - RPL_YOUREOPER is sent back to a client which has | |
2900 just successfully issued an OPER message and gained | |
2901 operator status. | |
2902 | |
2903 382 RPL_REHASHING | |
2904 "<config file> :Rehashing" | |
2905 | |
2906 - If the REHASH option is used and an operator sends | |
2907 a REHASH message, an RPL_REHASHING is sent back to | |
2908 the operator. | |
2909 | |
2910 391 RPL_TIME | |
2911 | |
2912 | |
2913 | |
2914 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 52] | |
2915 | |
2916 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2917 | |
2918 | |
2919 "<server> :<string showing server's local time>" | |
2920 | |
2921 - When replying to the TIME message, a server must send | |
2922 the reply using the RPL_TIME format above. The string | |
2923 showing the time need only contain the correct day and | |
2924 time there. There is no further requirement for the | |
2925 time string. | |
2926 | |
2927 392 RPL_USERSSTART | |
2928 ":UserID Terminal Host" | |
2929 393 RPL_USERS | |
2930 ":%-8s %-9s %-8s" | |
2931 394 RPL_ENDOFUSERS | |
2932 ":End of users" | |
2933 395 RPL_NOUSERS | |
2934 ":Nobody logged in" | |
2935 | |
2936 - If the USERS message is handled by a server, the | |
2937 replies RPL_USERSTART, RPL_USERS, RPL_ENDOFUSERS and | |
2938 RPL_NOUSERS are used. RPL_USERSSTART must be sent | |
2939 first, following by either a sequence of RPL_USERS | |
2940 or a single RPL_NOUSER. Following this is | |
2941 RPL_ENDOFUSERS. | |
2942 | |
2943 200 RPL_TRACELINK | |
2944 "Link <version & debug level> <destination> \ | |
2945 <next server>" | |
2946 201 RPL_TRACECONNECTING | |
2947 "Try. <class> <server>" | |
2948 202 RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE | |
2949 "H.S. <class> <server>" | |
2950 203 RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN | |
2951 "???? <class> [<client IP address in dot form>]" | |
2952 204 RPL_TRACEOPERATOR | |
2953 "Oper <class> <nick>" | |
2954 205 RPL_TRACEUSER | |
2955 "User <class> <nick>" | |
2956 206 RPL_TRACESERVER | |
2957 "Serv <class> <int>S <int>C <server> \ | |
2958 <nick!user|*!*>@<host|server>" | |
2959 208 RPL_TRACENEWTYPE | |
2960 "<newtype> 0 <client name>" | |
2961 261 RPL_TRACELOG | |
2962 "File <logfile> <debug level>" | |
2963 | |
2964 - The RPL_TRACE* are all returned by the server in | |
2965 response to the TRACE message. How many are | |
2966 returned is dependent on the the TRACE message and | |
2967 | |
2968 | |
2969 | |
2970 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 53] | |
2971 | |
2972 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
2973 | |
2974 | |
2975 whether it was sent by an operator or not. There | |
2976 is no predefined order for which occurs first. | |
2977 Replies RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN, RPL_TRACECONNECTING and | |
2978 RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE are all used for connections | |
2979 which have not been fully established and are either | |
2980 unknown, still attempting to connect or in the | |
2981 process of completing the 'server handshake'. | |
2982 RPL_TRACELINK is sent by any server which handles | |
2983 a TRACE message and has to pass it on to another | |
2984 server. The list of RPL_TRACELINKs sent in | |
2985 response to a TRACE command traversing the IRC | |
2986 network should reflect the actual connectivity of | |
2987 the servers themselves along that path. | |
2988 RPL_TRACENEWTYPE is to be used for any connection | |
2989 which does not fit in the other categories but is | |
2990 being displayed anyway. | |
2991 | |
2992 211 RPL_STATSLINKINFO | |
2993 "<linkname> <sendq> <sent messages> \ | |
2994 <sent bytes> <received messages> \ | |
2995 <received bytes> <time open>" | |
2996 212 RPL_STATSCOMMANDS | |
2997 "<command> <count>" | |
2998 213 RPL_STATSCLINE | |
2999 "C <host> * <name> <port> <class>" | |
3000 214 RPL_STATSNLINE | |
3001 "N <host> * <name> <port> <class>" | |
3002 215 RPL_STATSILINE | |
3003 "I <host> * <host> <port> <class>" | |
3004 216 RPL_STATSKLINE | |
3005 "K <host> * <username> <port> <class>" | |
3006 218 RPL_STATSYLINE | |
3007 "Y <class> <ping frequency> <connect \ | |
3008 frequency> <max sendq>" | |
3009 219 RPL_ENDOFSTATS | |
3010 "<stats letter> :End of /STATS report" | |
3011 241 RPL_STATSLLINE | |
3012 "L <hostmask> * <servername> <maxdepth>" | |
3013 242 RPL_STATSUPTIME | |
3014 ":Server Up %d days %d:%02d:%02d" | |
3015 243 RPL_STATSOLINE | |
3016 "O <hostmask> * <name>" | |
3017 244 RPL_STATSHLINE | |
3018 "H <hostmask> * <servername>" | |
3019 | |
3020 221 RPL_UMODEIS | |
3021 "<user mode string>" | |
3022 | |
3023 | |
3024 | |
3025 | |
3026 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 54] | |
3027 | |
3028 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3029 | |
3030 | |
3031 - To answer a query about a client's own mode, | |
3032 RPL_UMODEIS is sent back. | |
3033 | |
3034 251 RPL_LUSERCLIENT | |
3035 ":There are <integer> users and <integer> \ | |
3036 invisible on <integer> servers" | |
3037 252 RPL_LUSEROP | |
3038 "<integer> :operator(s) online" | |
3039 253 RPL_LUSERUNKNOWN | |
3040 "<integer> :unknown connection(s)" | |
3041 254 RPL_LUSERCHANNELS | |
3042 "<integer> :channels formed" | |
3043 255 RPL_LUSERME | |
3044 ":I have <integer> clients and <integer> \ | |
3045 servers" | |
3046 | |
3047 - In processing an LUSERS message, the server | |
3048 sends a set of replies from RPL_LUSERCLIENT, | |
3049 RPL_LUSEROP, RPL_USERUNKNOWN, | |
3050 RPL_LUSERCHANNELS and RPL_LUSERME. When | |
3051 replying, a server must send back | |
3052 RPL_LUSERCLIENT and RPL_LUSERME. The other | |
3053 replies are only sent back if a non-zero count | |
3054 is found for them. | |
3055 | |
3056 256 RPL_ADMINME | |
3057 "<server> :Administrative info" | |
3058 257 RPL_ADMINLOC1 | |
3059 ":<admin info>" | |
3060 258 RPL_ADMINLOC2 | |
3061 ":<admin info>" | |
3062 259 RPL_ADMINEMAIL | |
3063 ":<admin info>" | |
3064 | |
3065 - When replying to an ADMIN message, a server | |
3066 is expected to use replies RLP_ADMINME | |
3067 through to RPL_ADMINEMAIL and provide a text | |
3068 message with each. For RPL_ADMINLOC1 a | |
3069 description of what city, state and country | |
3070 the server is in is expected, followed by | |
3071 details of the university and department | |
3072 (RPL_ADMINLOC2) and finally the administrative | |
3073 contact for the server (an email address here | |
3074 is required) in RPL_ADMINEMAIL. | |
3075 | |
3076 | |
3077 | |
3078 | |
3079 | |
3080 | |
3081 | |
3082 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 55] | |
3083 | |
3084 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3085 | |
3086 | |
3087 6.3 Reserved numerics. | |
3088 | |
3089 These numerics are not described above since they fall into one of | |
3090 the following categories: | |
3091 | |
3092 1. no longer in use; | |
3093 | |
3094 2. reserved for future planned use; | |
3095 | |
3096 3. in current use but are part of a non-generic 'feature' of | |
3097 the current IRC server. | |
3098 | |
3099 209 RPL_TRACECLASS 217 RPL_STATSQLINE | |
3100 231 RPL_SERVICEINFO 232 RPL_ENDOFSERVICES | |
3101 233 RPL_SERVICE 234 RPL_SERVLIST | |
3102 235 RPL_SERVLISTEND | |
3103 316 RPL_WHOISCHANOP 361 RPL_KILLDONE | |
3104 362 RPL_CLOSING 363 RPL_CLOSEEND | |
3105 373 RPL_INFOSTART 384 RPL_MYPORTIS | |
3106 466 ERR_YOUWILLBEBANNED 476 ERR_BADCHANMASK | |
3107 492 ERR_NOSERVICEHOST | |
3108 | |
3109 7. Client and server authentication | |
3110 | |
3111 Clients and servers are both subject to the same level of | |
3112 authentication. For both, an IP number to hostname lookup (and | |
3113 reverse check on this) is performed for all connections made to the | |
3114 server. Both connections are then subject to a password check (if | |
3115 there is a password set for that connection). These checks are | |
3116 possible on all connections although the password check is only | |
3117 commonly used with servers. | |
3118 | |
3119 An additional check that is becoming of more and more common is that | |
3120 of the username responsible for making the connection. Finding the | |
3121 username of the other end of the connection typically involves | |
3122 connecting to an authentication server such as IDENT as described in | |
3123 RFC 1413. | |
3124 | |
3125 Given that without passwords it is not easy to reliably determine who | |
3126 is on the other end of a network connection, use of passwords is | |
3127 strongly recommended on inter-server connections in addition to any | |
3128 other measures such as using an ident server. | |
3129 | |
3130 8. Current implementations | |
3131 | |
3132 The only current implementation of this protocol is the IRC server, | |
3133 version 2.8. Earlier versions may implement some or all of the | |
3134 commands described by this document with NOTICE messages replacing | |
3135 | |
3136 | |
3137 | |
3138 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 56] | |
3139 | |
3140 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3141 | |
3142 | |
3143 many of the numeric replies. Unfortunately, due to backward | |
3144 compatibility requirements, the implementation of some parts of this | |
3145 document varies with what is laid out. On notable difference is: | |
3146 | |
3147 * recognition that any LF or CR anywhere in a message marks the | |
3148 end of that message (instead of requiring CR-LF); | |
3149 | |
3150 The rest of this section deals with issues that are mostly of | |
3151 importance to those who wish to implement a server but some parts | |
3152 also apply directly to clients as well. | |
3153 | |
3154 8.1 Network protocol: TCP - why it is best used here. | |
3155 | |
3156 IRC has been implemented on top of TCP since TCP supplies a reliable | |
3157 network protocol which is well suited to this scale of conferencing. | |
3158 The use of multicast IP is an alternative, but it is not widely | |
3159 available or supported at the present time. | |
3160 | |
3161 8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets | |
3162 | |
3163 Given that Unix domain sockets allow listen/connect operations, the | |
3164 current implementation can be configured to listen and accept both | |
3165 client and server connections on a Unix domain socket. These are | |
3166 recognized as sockets where the hostname starts with a '/'. | |
3167 | |
3168 When providing any information about the connections on a Unix domain | |
3169 socket, the server is required to supplant the actual hostname in | |
3170 place of the pathname unless the actual socket name is being asked | |
3171 for. | |
3172 | |
3173 8.2 Command Parsing | |
3174 | |
3175 To provide useful 'non-buffered' network IO for clients and servers, | |
3176 each connection is given its own private 'input buffer' in which the | |
3177 results of the most recent read and parsing are kept. A buffer size | |
3178 of 512 bytes is used so as to hold 1 full message, although, this | |
3179 will usually hold several commands. The private buffer is parsed | |
3180 after every read operation for valid messages. When dealing with | |
3181 multiple messages from one client in the buffer, care should be taken | |
3182 in case one happens to cause the client to be 'removed'. | |
3183 | |
3184 8.3 Message delivery | |
3185 | |
3186 It is common to find network links saturated or hosts to which you | |
3187 are sending data unable to send data. Although Unix typically | |
3188 handles this through the TCP window and internal buffers, the server | |
3189 often has large amounts of data to send (especially when a new | |
3190 server-server link forms) and the small buffers provided in the | |
3191 | |
3192 | |
3193 | |
3194 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 57] | |
3195 | |
3196 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3197 | |
3198 | |
3199 kernel are not enough for the outgoing queue. To alleviate this | |
3200 problem, a "send queue" is used as a FIFO queue for data to be sent. | |
3201 A typical "send queue" may grow to 200 Kbytes on a large IRC network | |
3202 with a slow network connection when a new server connects. | |
3203 | |
3204 When polling its connections, a server will first read and parse all | |
3205 incoming data, queuing any data to be sent out. When all available | |
3206 input is processed, the queued data is sent. This reduces the number | |
3207 of write() system calls and helps TCP make bigger packets. | |
3208 | |
3209 8.4 Connection 'Liveness' | |
3210 | |
3211 To detect when a connection has died or become unresponsive, the | |
3212 server must ping each of its connections that it doesn't get a | |
3213 response from in a given amount of time. | |
3214 | |
3215 If a connection doesn't respond in time, its connection is closed | |
3216 using the appropriate procedures. A connection is also dropped if | |
3217 its sendq grows beyond the maximum allowed, because it is better to | |
3218 close a slow connection than have a server process block. | |
3219 | |
3220 8.5 Establishing a server to client connection | |
3221 | |
3222 Upon connecting to an IRC server, a client is sent the MOTD (if | |
3223 present) as well as the current user/server count (as per the LUSER | |
3224 command). The server is also required to give an unambiguous message | |
3225 to the client which states its name and version as well as any other | |
3226 introductory messages which may be deemed appropriate. | |
3227 | |
3228 After dealing with this, the server must then send out the new user's | |
3229 nickname and other information as supplied by itself (USER command) | |
3230 and as the server could discover (from DNS/authentication servers). | |
3231 The server must send this information out with NICK first followed by | |
3232 USER. | |
3233 | |
3234 8.6 Establishing a server-server connection. | |
3235 | |
3236 The process of establishing of a server-to-server connection is | |
3237 fraught with danger since there are many possible areas where | |
3238 problems can occur - the least of which are race conditions. | |
3239 | |
3240 After a server has received a connection following by a PASS/SERVER | |
3241 pair which were recognised as being valid, the server should then | |
3242 reply with its own PASS/SERVER information for that connection as | |
3243 well as all of the other state information it knows about as | |
3244 described below. | |
3245 | |
3246 When the initiating server receives a PASS/SERVER pair, it too then | |
3247 | |
3248 | |
3249 | |
3250 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 58] | |
3251 | |
3252 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3253 | |
3254 | |
3255 checks that the server responding is authenticated properly before | |
3256 accepting the connection to be that server. | |
3257 | |
3258 8.6.1 Server exchange of state information when connecting | |
3259 | |
3260 The order of state information being exchanged between servers is | |
3261 essential. The required order is as follows: | |
3262 | |
3263 * all known other servers; | |
3264 | |
3265 * all known user information; | |
3266 | |
3267 * all known channel information. | |
3268 | |
3269 Information regarding servers is sent via extra SERVER messages, user | |
3270 information with NICK/USER/MODE/JOIN messages and channels with MODE | |
3271 messages. | |
3272 | |
3273 NOTE: channel topics are *NOT* exchanged here because the TOPIC | |
3274 command overwrites any old topic information, so at best, the two | |
3275 sides of the connection would exchange topics. | |
3276 | |
3277 By passing the state information about servers first, any collisions | |
3278 with servers that already exist occur before nickname collisions due | |
3279 to a second server introducing a particular nickname. Due to the IRC | |
3280 network only being able to exist as an acyclic graph, it may be | |
3281 possible that the network has already reconnected in another | |
3282 location, the place where the collision occurs indicating where the | |
3283 net needs to split. | |
3284 | |
3285 8.7 Terminating server-client connections | |
3286 | |
3287 When a client connection closes, a QUIT message is generated on | |
3288 behalf of the client by the server to which the client connected. No | |
3289 other message is to be generated or used. | |
3290 | |
3291 8.8 Terminating server-server connections | |
3292 | |
3293 If a server-server connection is closed, either via a remotely | |
3294 generated SQUIT or 'natural' causes, the rest of the connected IRC | |
3295 network must have its information updated with by the server which | |
3296 detected the closure. The server then sends a list of SQUITs (one | |
3297 for each server behind that connection) and a list of QUITs (again, | |
3298 one for each client behind that connection). | |
3299 | |
3300 | |
3301 | |
3302 | |
3303 | |
3304 | |
3305 | |
3306 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 59] | |
3307 | |
3308 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3309 | |
3310 | |
3311 8.9 Tracking nickname changes | |
3312 | |
3313 All IRC servers are required to keep a history of recent nickname | |
3314 changes. This is required to allow the server to have a chance of | |
3315 keeping in touch of things when nick-change race conditions occur | |
3316 with commands which manipulate them. Commands which must trace nick | |
3317 changes are: | |
3318 | |
3319 * KILL (the nick being killed) | |
3320 | |
3321 * MODE (+/- o,v) | |
3322 | |
3323 * KICK (the nick being kicked) | |
3324 | |
3325 No other commands are to have nick changes checked for. | |
3326 | |
3327 In the above cases, the server is required to first check for the | |
3328 existence of the nickname, then check its history to see who that | |
3329 nick currently belongs to (if anyone!). This reduces the chances of | |
3330 race conditions but they can still occur with the server ending up | |
3331 affecting the wrong client. When performing a change trace for an | |
3332 above command it is recommended that a time range be given and | |
3333 entries which are too old ignored. | |
3334 | |
3335 For a reasonable history, a server should be able to keep previous | |
3336 nickname for every client it knows about if they all decided to | |
3337 change. This size is limited by other factors (such as memory, etc). | |
3338 | |
3339 8.10 Flood control of clients | |
3340 | |
3341 With a large network of interconnected IRC servers, it is quite easy | |
3342 for any single client attached to the network to supply a continuous | |
3343 stream of messages that result in not only flooding the network, but | |
3344 also degrading the level of service provided to others. Rather than | |
3345 require every 'victim' to be provide their own protection, flood | |
3346 protection was written into the server and is applied to all clients | |
3347 except services. The current algorithm is as follows: | |
3348 | |
3349 * check to see if client's `message timer' is less than | |
3350 current time (set to be equal if it is); | |
3351 | |
3352 * read any data present from the client; | |
3353 | |
3354 * while the timer is less than ten seconds ahead of the current | |
3355 time, parse any present messages and penalize the client by | |
3356 2 seconds for each message; | |
3357 | |
3358 which in essence means that the client may send 1 message every 2 | |
3359 | |
3360 | |
3361 | |
3362 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 60] | |
3363 | |
3364 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3365 | |
3366 | |
3367 seconds without being adversely affected. | |
3368 | |
3369 8.11 Non-blocking lookups | |
3370 | |
3371 In a real-time environment, it is essential that a server process do | |
3372 as little waiting as possible so that all the clients are serviced | |
3373 fairly. Obviously this requires non-blocking IO on all network | |
3374 read/write operations. For normal server connections, this was not | |
3375 difficult, but there are other support operations that may cause the | |
3376 server to block (such as disk reads). Where possible, such activity | |
3377 should be performed with a short timeout. | |
3378 | |
3379 8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups | |
3380 | |
3381 Using the standard resolver libraries from Berkeley and others has | |
3382 meant large delays in some cases where replies have timed out. To | |
3383 avoid this, a separate set of DNS routines were written which were | |
3384 setup for non-blocking IO operations and then polled from within the | |
3385 main server IO loop. | |
3386 | |
3387 8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups | |
3388 | |
3389 Although there are numerous ident libraries for use and inclusion | |
3390 into other programs, these caused problems since they operated in a | |
3391 synchronous manner and resulted in frequent delays. Again the | |
3392 solution was to write a set of routines which would cooperate with | |
3393 the rest of the server and work using non-blocking IO. | |
3394 | |
3395 8.12 Configuration File | |
3396 | |
3397 To provide a flexible way of setting up and running the server, it is | |
3398 recommended that a configuration file be used which contains | |
3399 instructions to the server on the following: | |
3400 | |
3401 * which hosts to accept client connections from; | |
3402 | |
3403 * which hosts to allow to connect as servers; | |
3404 | |
3405 * which hosts to connect to (both actively and | |
3406 passively); | |
3407 | |
3408 * information about where the server is (university, | |
3409 city/state, company are examples of this); | |
3410 | |
3411 * who is responsible for the server and an email address | |
3412 at which they can be contacted; | |
3413 | |
3414 * hostnames and passwords for clients which wish to be given | |
3415 | |
3416 | |
3417 | |
3418 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 61] | |
3419 | |
3420 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3421 | |
3422 | |
3423 access to restricted operator commands. | |
3424 | |
3425 In specifying hostnames, both domain names and use of the 'dot' | |
3426 notation (127.0.0.1) should both be accepted. It must be possible to | |
3427 specify the password to be used/accepted for all outgoing and | |
3428 incoming connections (although the only outgoing connections are | |
3429 those to other servers). | |
3430 | |
3431 The above list is the minimum requirement for any server which wishes | |
3432 to make a connection with another server. Other items which may be | |
3433 of use are: | |
3434 | |
3435 * specifying which servers other server may introduce; | |
3436 | |
3437 * how deep a server branch is allowed to become; | |
3438 | |
3439 * hours during which clients may connect. | |
3440 | |
3441 8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect | |
3442 | |
3443 A server should use some sort of 'access control list' (either in the | |
3444 configuration file or elsewhere) that is read at startup and used to | |
3445 decide what hosts clients may use to connect to it. | |
3446 | |
3447 Both 'deny' and 'allow' should be implemented to provide the required | |
3448 flexibility for host access control. | |
3449 | |
3450 8.12.2 Operators | |
3451 | |
3452 The granting of operator privileges to a disruptive person can have | |
3453 dire consequences for the well-being of the IRC net in general due to | |
3454 the powers given to them. Thus, the acquisition of such powers | |
3455 should not be very easy. The current setup requires two 'passwords' | |
3456 to be used although one of them is usually easy guessed. Storage of | |
3457 oper passwords in configuration files is preferable to hard coding | |
3458 them in and should be stored in a crypted format (ie using crypt(3) | |
3459 from Unix) to prevent easy theft. | |
3460 | |
3461 8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect | |
3462 | |
3463 The interconnection of server is not a trivial matter: a bad | |
3464 connection can have a large impact on the usefulness of IRC. Thus, | |
3465 each server should have a list of servers to which it may connect and | |
3466 which servers may connect to it. Under no circumstances should a | |
3467 server allow an arbitrary host to connect as a server. In addition | |
3468 to which servers may and may not connect, the configuration file | |
3469 should also store the password and other characteristics of that | |
3470 link. | |
3471 | |
3472 | |
3473 | |
3474 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 62] | |
3475 | |
3476 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3477 | |
3478 | |
3479 8.12.4 Administrivia | |
3480 | |
3481 To provide accurate and valid replies to the ADMIN command (see | |
3482 section 4.3.7), the server should find the relevant details in the | |
3483 configuration. | |
3484 | |
3485 8.13 Channel membership | |
3486 | |
3487 The current server allows any registered local user to join upto 10 | |
3488 different channels. There is no limit imposed on non-local users so | |
3489 that the server remains (reasonably) consistant with all others on a | |
3490 channel membership basis | |
3491 | |
3492 9. Current problems | |
3493 | |
3494 There are a number of recognized problems with this protocol, all of | |
3495 which hope to be solved sometime in the near future during its | |
3496 rewrite. Currently, work is underway to find working solutions to | |
3497 these problems. | |
3498 | |
3499 9.1 Scalability | |
3500 | |
3501 It is widely recognized that this protocol does not scale | |
3502 sufficiently well when used in a large arena. The main problem comes | |
3503 from the requirement that all servers know about all other servers | |
3504 and users and that information regarding them be updated as soon as | |
3505 it changes. It is also desirable to keep the number of servers low | |
3506 so that the path length between any two points is kept minimal and | |
3507 the spanning tree as strongly branched as possible. | |
3508 | |
3509 9.2 Labels | |
3510 | |
3511 The current IRC protocol has 3 types of labels: the nickname, the | |
3512 channel name and the server name. Each of the three types has its | |
3513 own domain and no duplicates are allowed inside that domain. | |
3514 Currently, it is possible for users to pick the label for any of the | |
3515 three, resulting in collisions. It is widely recognized that this | |
3516 needs reworking, with a plan for unique names for channels and nicks | |
3517 that don't collide being desirable as well as a solution allowing a | |
3518 cyclic tree. | |
3519 | |
3520 9.2.1 Nicknames | |
3521 | |
3522 The idea of the nickname on IRC is very convenient for users to use | |
3523 when talking to each other outside of a channel, but there is only a | |
3524 finite nickname space and being what they are, its not uncommon for | |
3525 several people to want to use the same nick. If a nickname is chosen | |
3526 by two people using this protocol, either one will not succeed or | |
3527 | |
3528 | |
3529 | |
3530 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 63] | |
3531 | |
3532 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3533 | |
3534 | |
3535 both will removed by use of KILL (4.6.1). | |
3536 | |
3537 9.2.2 Channels | |
3538 | |
3539 The current channel layout requires that all servers know about all | |
3540 channels, their inhabitants and properties. Besides not scaling | |
3541 well, the issue of privacy is also a concern. A collision of | |
3542 channels is treated as an inclusive event (both people who create the | |
3543 new channel are considered to be members of it) rather than an | |
3544 exclusive one such as used to solve nickname collisions. | |
3545 | |
3546 9.2.3 Servers | |
3547 | |
3548 Although the number of servers is usually small relative to the | |
3549 number of users and channels, they two currently required to be known | |
3550 globally, either each one separately or hidden behind a mask. | |
3551 | |
3552 9.3 Algorithms | |
3553 | |
3554 In some places within the server code, it has not been possible to | |
3555 avoid N^2 algorithms such as checking the channel list of a set | |
3556 of clients. | |
3557 | |
3558 In current server versions, there are no database consistency checks, | |
3559 each server assumes that a neighbouring server is correct. This | |
3560 opens the door to large problems if a connecting server is buggy or | |
3561 otherwise tries to introduce contradictions to the existing net. | |
3562 | |
3563 Currently, because of the lack of unique internal and global labels, | |
3564 there are a multitude of race conditions that exist. These race | |
3565 conditions generally arise from the problem of it taking time for | |
3566 messages to traverse and effect the IRC network. Even by changing to | |
3567 unique labels, there are problems with channel-related commands being | |
3568 disrupted. | |
3569 | |
3570 10. Current support and availability | |
3571 | |
3572 Mailing lists for IRC related discussion: | |
3573 Future protocol: ircd-three-request@eff.org | |
3574 General discussion: operlist-request@eff.org | |
3575 | |
3576 Software implemenations | |
3577 cs.bu.edu:/irc | |
3578 nic.funet.fi:/pub/irc | |
3579 coombs.anu.edu.au:/pub/irc | |
3580 | |
3581 Newsgroup: alt.irc | |
3582 | |
3583 | |
3584 | |
3585 | |
3586 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 64] | |
3587 | |
3588 RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 | |
3589 | |
3590 | |
3591 Security Considerations | |
3592 | |
3593 Security issues are discussed in sections 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.3, 5.5, and | |
3594 7. | |
3595 | |
3596 12. Authors' Addresses | |
3597 | |
3598 Jarkko Oikarinen | |
3599 Tuirantie 17 as 9 | |
3600 90500 OULU | |
3601 FINLAND | |
3602 | |
3603 Email: jto@tolsun.oulu.fi | |
3604 | |
3605 | |
3606 Darren Reed | |
3607 4 Pateman Street | |
3608 Watsonia, Victoria 3087 | |
3609 Australia | |
3610 | |
3611 Email: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au | |
3612 | |
3613 | |
3614 | |
3615 | |
3616 | |
3617 | |
3618 | |
3619 | |
3620 | |
3621 | |
3622 | |
3623 | |
3624 | |
3625 | |
3626 | |
3627 | |
3628 | |
3629 | |
3630 | |
3631 | |
3632 | |
3633 | |
3634 | |
3635 | |
3636 | |
3637 | |
3638 | |
3639 | |
3640 | |
3641 | |
3642 Oikarinen & Reed [Page 65] | |
3643 |