view libpurple/protocols/zephyr/ZSendList.c @ 20550:28493a27849b

Looking at purple_contact_set_alias and purple_blist_alias_contact functions in blist.c, the only difference I see is that the latter function notifies any existing conversation with the contact so that it can update its title, while the former doesn't. I can't think of a reason why they should behave differently, or why we should have both of them. I was going to deprecate purple_blist_alias_contact in favour of purple_contact_set_alias, but seeing we do purple_blist_alias_ for buddy and chats, I am deprecating purple_contact_set_alias instead. OK?
author Sadrul Habib Chowdhury <imadil@gmail.com>
date Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:01:45 +0000
parents 5fe8042783c1
children c38d72677c8a
line wrap: on
line source

/* This file is part of the Project Athena Zephyr Notification System.
 * It contains source for the ZSendList function.
 *
 *	Created by:	Robert French
 *
 *	Copyright (c) 1987 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 *	For copying and distribution information, see the file
 *	"mit-copyright.h". 
 */

#include "internal.h"

Code_t ZSendList(notice, list, nitems, cert_routine)
    ZNotice_t *notice;
    char *list[];
    int nitems;
    Z_AuthProc cert_routine;
{
    return(ZSrvSendList(notice, list, nitems, cert_routine, Z_XmitFragment));
}

Code_t ZSrvSendList(notice, list, nitems, cert_routine, send_routine)
    ZNotice_t *notice;
    char *list[];
    int nitems;
    Z_AuthProc cert_routine;
    Code_t (*send_routine)();
{
    Code_t retval;
    ZNotice_t newnotice;
    char *buffer;
    int len;

    if ((retval = ZFormatNoticeList(notice, list, nitems, &buffer, 
				    &len, cert_routine)) != ZERR_NONE)
	return (retval);

    if ((retval = ZParseNotice(buffer, len, &newnotice)) != ZERR_NONE)
	return (retval);
    
    retval = Z_SendFragmentedNotice(&newnotice, len, cert_routine,
				    send_routine);

    free(buffer);

    return (retval);
}