# HG changeset patch # User Luke Schierer # Date 1114812484 0 # Node ID 8175206faa3d007366377491de5fda12f2a904fb # Parent 8b8c590690280e34d6a8fbdbf7f106a9d9207e39 [gaim-migrate @ 12599] 1)i forgot to mention prefs 2)IFF was intentional committer: Tailor Script diff -r 8b8c59069028 -r 8175206faa3d TODO --- a/TODO Fri Apr 29 21:51:46 2005 +0000 +++ b/TODO Fri Apr 29 22:08:04 2005 +0000 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ * how do we log this? {{{ * rlaager's proposal: {{{ * the goal of logging is to be able to find something again. - * you expect to see the logs for a person IF they are in that conversation + * you expect to see the logs for a person IFF they are in that conversation * you don't really need to see the log of a chat before or after said person joined it *if you did, you'd be looking at some other person(s)'s log * so: @@ -89,3 +89,24 @@ * Test each call to make sure it actually works * Make it work with G_MODULE_BIND_LOCAL }}} +* Prefs {{{ + * this blocks for 2.0.0 + * Prefs cannot stay as-is. the dialog is far too wide and not at all usable. + * The biggest problem is that each new plugin creates horizontal space. {{{ + * I do not see it as a solution to remove the posability of plugin preferences. + * In the past, we had a separate plugin management dialog. People never found it, + and were often surprised to learn that gaim had plugins at all. I am unsure that + people find the current plugin page of preferences any more frequently, but I + *suspect* that it is the case. This leads to a conundrum, how do plugins + display preferences? + }}} + * Currently the window is, at my font size, 1129x505 (or should that be 505x1129?). It *should* fit + in 800x600 at worst, I'm unsure that 480x640 is a reasonable goal. still, this leaves us with + something either considerably wider or considerably taller than we are currently using (on any + given pane, the tabs force the width, not the contents). Further, taking "Message Text" as an + example, it has 3 preferences and a text area, each in its own category (the text area sharing a + category with 1 preference). obvious waste of space here. All 3 could clearly be uncategorised + without loss of meaning, categories only make sense for groups of preferences. It may even be + possible to combine this with "Conversations" entirely. +}}} +