annotate etc/LPF @ 66821:8139e472d52b

(apropos-match-face): Doc fix. (apropos-sort-by-scores): Add new choice `verbose'. (apropos-documentation-sort-by-scores): New defcustom. (apropos-pattern): Now contains the pattern entered by the user. (apropos-pattern-quoted): New defvar. (apropos-regexp): New defvar, containing the regexp corresponding to apropos-pattern. (apropos-all-words-regexp): Renamed from apropos-all-regexp. (apropos-read-pattern): New defun. Use it to read pattern arg in interactive calls; returns list of words for a word list, and string for a regexp. (apropos-parse-pattern): Renamed from apropos-rewrite-regexp. Now parses a list of words or regexp as returned by apropos-read-pattern. (apropos-calc-scores): Return nil if apropos-regexp doesn't match. (apropos-score-doc): Return a very high score if the string entered by the user matches literally. (apropos-variable): Doc fix. Use apropos-read-pattern. (apropos-command): Doc fix. Use apropos-read-pattern and apropos-parse-pattern. Call apropos-print with nosubst=t. (apropos, apropos-value): Doc fix. Use apropos-read-pattern and apropos-parse-pattern. (apropos-documentation): Doc fix. Use apropos-read-pattern and apropos-parse-pattern. Locally bind apropos-sort-by-scores to apropos-documentation-sort-by-scores. Call apropos-print with nosubst=t. (apropos-documentation-internal): Pass doc string through substitute-key-definition before adding text properties. Highlight substring matching literal user input if possible. (apropos-documentation-check-doc-file): Remove locals beg and end. Fix calculation of score (as added twice). Pass doc string through substitute-key-definition before adding text properties. (apropos-documentation-check-elc-file): Pass doc string through substitute-key-definition before adding text properties. Highlight substring matching literal user input if possible. (apropos-print): Add new arg NOSUBST; if set, command and variable doc strings have already been passed through substitute-key-definition. Add code to handle apropos-accumulator items without score element for backwards compatibility (e.g. with woman package). Only show scores if apropos-sort-by-scores is `verbose'.

	   Protect Your Freedom to Write Programs
	   Join the League for Programming Freedom
	       (Version of February 3, 1994)

Ten years ago, programmers were allowed to write programs using all
the techniques they knew, and providing whatever features they felt
were useful.  This is no longer the case.  New monopolies, known as
software patents and interface copyrights, have taken away our freedom
of expression and our ability to do a good job.

"Look and feel" lawsuits attempt to monopolize well-known command
languages; some have succeeded.  Copyrights on command languages
enforce gratuitous incompatibility, close opportunities for
competition, and stifle incremental improvements.

Software patents are even more dangerous; they make every design
decision in the development of a program carry a risk of a lawsuit,
with draconian pretrial seizure.  It is difficult and expensive to
find out whether the techniques you consider using are patented; it is
impossible to find out whether they will be patented in the future.

The League for Programming Freedom is a grass-roots organization of
professors, students, businessmen, programmers and users dedicated to
bringing back the freedom to write programs.  The League is not
opposed to the legal system that Congress expressly established for
software--copyright on individual programs.  Our aim is to reverse the
recent changes that prevent programmers from doing their work.

The League works to abolish the new monopolies by publishing articles,
talking with public officials, denouncing egregious offenders, and
filing amicus curiae briefs, most notably against Lotus in its suit
against Borland.  We testified twice at the recent Patent Office
hearings on software patents.  We welcome suggestions for other
activities, as well as help in carrying them out.


(Added 2003) The League for Programming Freedom is inactive nowadays,
though its web site www.programming-freedom.org is still maintained.
It would be very useful to find a person who could take the initiative
to get the LPF operating again.  It will be a substantial job,
requiring persistence and working with a lawyer.  If you want to do
it, please write to [e-mail].