annotate etc/LPF @ 67894:d742983a2136

(bibtex-entry-type-whitespace) (bibtex-entry-type-str, bibtex-empty-field-re) (bibtex-search-backward-string, bibtex-preamble-prefix) (bibtex-search-entry, bibtex-enclosing-entry-maybe-empty-head): Removed. (bibtex-any-valid-entry-type): New variable. (bibtex-parse-field-name): Simplify. (bibtex-parse-string, bibtex-search-forward-string): New arg empty-key. (bibtex-preamble-prefix): Include left delimiter. (bibtex-search-forward-field, bibtex-search-backward-field): Allow unbounded search past entry boundaries (required by bibtex-pop). (bibtex-text-in-field-bounds): Use push. (bibtex-text-in-field): Do not use bibtex-narrow-to-entry. (bibtex-parse-preamble, bibtex-valid-entry) (bibtex-beginning-first-field): New functions. (bibtex-skip-to-valid-entry): Use bibtex-valid-entry. Fix regexp. (bibtex-map-entries): Fix docstring. (bibtex-flash-head): New arg prompt. Simplify. (bibtex-enclosing-field): Include code of bibtex-inside-field. (bibtex-insert-kill): Simplify. Always insert text past the current field or entry. (bibtex-format-entry): Use bibtex-parse-field. (bibtex-pop): Use bibtex-beginning-of-entry and bibtex-end-of-entry to initiate the search. Insert empty field if we found ourselves. (bibtex-print-help-message): New args field and comma. Handle entry keys. (bibtex-make-field): Use bibtex-beginning-of-entry. (bibtex-end-of-entry): Use bibtex-valid-entry. Recognize any invalid entry. (bibtex-validate): Use bibtex-valid-entry and bibtex-parse-string. Handle preambles. Simplify code for thorough test. (bibtex-next-field, bibtex-find-text, bibtex-find-text-internal): New arg comma. Handle entry heads. (bibtex-remove-OPT-or-ALT, bibtex-remove-delimiters) (bibtex-kill-field, bibtex-copy-field-as-kil, bibtex-empty-field): New arg comma. (bibtex-kill-entry): Use bibtex-any-entry-maybe-empty-head. (bibtex-fill-field): Simplify. (bibtex-fill-entry): Use bibtex-beginning-first-field and bibtex-parse-field. (bibtex-convert-alien): Do not wait before calling bibtex-validate. (bibtex-complete): Use bibtex-parse-preamble.

	   Protect Your Freedom to Write Programs
	   Join the League for Programming Freedom
	       (Version of February 3, 1994)

Ten years ago, programmers were allowed to write programs using all
the techniques they knew, and providing whatever features they felt
were useful.  This is no longer the case.  New monopolies, known as
software patents and interface copyrights, have taken away our freedom
of expression and our ability to do a good job.

"Look and feel" lawsuits attempt to monopolize well-known command
languages; some have succeeded.  Copyrights on command languages
enforce gratuitous incompatibility, close opportunities for
competition, and stifle incremental improvements.

Software patents are even more dangerous; they make every design
decision in the development of a program carry a risk of a lawsuit,
with draconian pretrial seizure.  It is difficult and expensive to
find out whether the techniques you consider using are patented; it is
impossible to find out whether they will be patented in the future.

The League for Programming Freedom is a grass-roots organization of
professors, students, businessmen, programmers and users dedicated to
bringing back the freedom to write programs.  The League is not
opposed to the legal system that Congress expressly established for
software--copyright on individual programs.  Our aim is to reverse the
recent changes that prevent programmers from doing their work.

The League works to abolish the new monopolies by publishing articles,
talking with public officials, denouncing egregious offenders, and
filing amicus curiae briefs, most notably against Lotus in its suit
against Borland.  We testified twice at the recent Patent Office
hearings on software patents.  We welcome suggestions for other
activities, as well as help in carrying them out.


(Added 2003) The League for Programming Freedom is inactive nowadays,
though its web site www.programming-freedom.org is still maintained.
It would be very useful to find a person who could take the initiative
to get the LPF operating again.  It will be a substantial job,
requiring persistence and working with a lawyer.  If you want to do
it, please write to [e-mail].