Mercurial > emacs
comparison etc/CENSORSHIP @ 25853:e96ffe544684
#
author | Dave Love <fx@gnu.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 03 Oct 1999 12:39:42 +0000 |
parents | |
children | 01772baf50a3 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
25852:03ddf0b96330 | 25853:e96ffe544684 |
---|---|
1 Censoring my Software | |
2 Richard Stallman | |
3 [From Datamation, 1 March 1996] | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 Last summer, a few clever legislators proposed a bill to "prohibit | |
7 pornography" on the Internet. Last fall, right-wing Christians made | |
8 this cause their own. Last week, President Clinton signed the bill, | |
9 and we lost the freedom of the press for the public library of the | |
10 future. This week, I'm censoring GNU Emacs. | |
11 | |
12 No, GNU Emacs does not contain pornography. It is a software package, | |
13 an award-winning extensible and programmable text editor. But the law | |
14 that was passed applies to far more than pornography. It prohibits | |
15 "indecent" speech, which can include anything from famous poems, to | |
16 masterpieces hanging in the Louvre, to advice about safe sex...to | |
17 software. | |
18 | |
19 Naturally, there was a lot of opposition to this bill. Not only from | |
20 people who use the Internet, and people who appreciate erotica, but | |
21 from everyone who cares about freedom of the press. | |
22 | |
23 But every time we tried to tell the public what was at stake, the | |
24 forces of censorship responded with a lie: they told the public that | |
25 the issue was simply pornography. By embedding this lie as a | |
26 presupposition in their statements about the issue, they succeeded in | |
27 misinforming the public. So here I am, censoring my software. | |
28 | |
29 You see, Emacs contains a version of the famous "doctor program", | |
30 a.k.a. Eliza, originally developed by Professor Weizenbaum at MIT. | |
31 This is the program that imitates a Rogerian psychotherapist. The | |
32 user talks to the program, and the program responds--by playing back | |
33 the user's own statements, and by recognizing a long list of | |
34 particular words. | |
35 | |
36 The Emacs doctor program was set up to recognize many common curse | |
37 words, and respond with an appropriately cute message such as, "Would | |
38 you please watch your tongue?" or "Let's not be vulgar." In order to | |
39 do this, it had to have a list of curse words. That means the source | |
40 code for the program was indecent. | |
41 | |
42 Because of the censorship law, I had to remove this feature. (I | |
43 replaced it with a message announcing that the program has been | |
44 censored for your protection.) The new version of the doctor doesn't | |
45 recognize the indecent words. If you curse at it, it curses right | |
46 back to you--for lack of knowing better. | |
47 | |
48 Now that people are facing the threat of two years in prison for | |
49 indecent network postings, it would be helpful if they could access | |
50 precise rules via the Internet for how to avoid imprisonment. | |
51 However, this is impossible. The rules would have to mention the | |
52 forbidden words, so posting them on the Internet would be against the | |
53 rules. | |
54 | |
55 Of course, I'm making an assumption about just what "indecent" means. | |
56 I have to do this, because nobody knows for sure. The most obvious | |
57 possibile meaning is the meaning it has for television, so I'm using | |
58 that as a tentative assumption. However, there is a good chance that | |
59 our courts will reject that interpretation of the law as | |
60 unconstitutional. | |
61 | |
62 We can hope that the courts will recognize the Internet as a medium of | |
63 publication like books and magazines. If they do, they will entirely | |
64 reject any law prohibiting "indecent" publications on the Internet. | |
65 | |
66 What really worries me is that the courts might take a muddled | |
67 in-between escape route--by choosing another interpretation of | |
68 "indecent", one that permits the doctor program or a statement of the | |
69 decency rules, but prohibits some of the books that children can | |
70 browse through in the public library and the bookstore. Over the | |
71 years, as the Internet replaces the public library and the bookstore, | |
72 some of our freedom of the press will be lost. | |
73 | |
74 Just a few weeks ago, another country imposed censorship on the | |
75 Internet. That was China. We don't think well of China in this | |
76 country--its government doesn't respect basic freedoms. But how well | |
77 does our government respect them? And do you care enough to preserve | |
78 them here? | |
79 | |
80 If you care, stay in touch with the Voters Telecommunications Watch. | |
81 Look in their Web site http://www.vtw.org/ for background information | |
82 and political action recommendations. Censorship won in February, but | |
83 we can beat it in November. | |
84 | |
85 | |
86 Copyright 1996 Richard Stallman | |
87 Verbatim copying and distribution is permitted in any medium | |
88 provided this notice is preserved. |