Mercurial > emacs
changeset 12307:03b002b0fe23
*** empty log message ***
| author | Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 18 Jun 1995 18:45:55 +0000 |
| parents | 173396dad212 |
| children | ed11e19b4264 |
| files | etc/FAQ |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/etc/FAQ Sun Jun 18 18:26:03 1995 +0000 +++ b/etc/FAQ Sun Jun 18 18:45:55 1995 +0000 @@ -1436,6 +1436,8 @@ Bugs/Problems 61: Does Emacs have problems with files larger than 8 megabytes? +[This problem has been solved better in Emacs 19.29 because the buffer +size limit is now 16 times as large.] Most installed versions of GNU Emacs will use 24-bit signed integers (and 24-bit pointers) internally. This limits the file size that Emacs can @@ -1891,9 +1893,10 @@ 81: What is the difference between Emacs and Epoch? - Epoch was a modified version of GNU Emacs. It is currently being merged + Epoch was a modified version of GNU Emacs. It was merged into XEmacs (formerly "Lucid Emacs"), and the Epoch redisplay, now - being rewritten, is slated to be merged into Emacs when the rewrite is done. + being totally rewritten, is slated to be merged into Emacs when the + rewrite is done. 82: What is the difference between Emacs and XEmacs (formerly "Lucid Emacs")? @@ -1904,8 +1907,8 @@ maintainers, had been included here. Richard Stallman removed it from this copy of the FAQ because it was unfair. It was (1) one-sided, listing only advantages of XEmacs and not advantages of - the principal version of Emacs, (2) biased, involving opinions the - FSF doesn't share, and (3) out of date, listing as advantages of + the principal version of Emacs, (2) biased, stating the opinions + of the XEmacs maintainers, and (3) out of date, listing as advantages of XEmacs features which in fact both versions have. 83: Where can I get Emacs for my PC running MS-DOS?