Mercurial > emacs
changeset 64244:118ee9a8f53a
Fix typos.
| author | Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:18:38 +0000 |
| parents | f334c0e6d54e |
| children | 4748803d9fb2 |
| files | man/gnu.texi |
| diffstat | 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/man/gnu.texi Tue Jul 12 06:16:38 2005 +0000 +++ b/man/gnu.texi Tue Jul 12 06:18:38 2005 +0000 @@ -382,13 +382,13 @@ difficult. People who have studied the issue of intellectual property -rights@footnote{n the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was +rights@footnote{In the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.'' That term is obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together various disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely, lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent -issue. The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and +issue. The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and trademarks separately. See @uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully