diff en/tour-basic.tex @ 99:06383f9e46e4

More graphics.

--- a/en/tour-basic.tex	Mon Oct 16 11:38:06 2006 -0700
+++ b/en/tour-basic.tex	Mon Oct 16 14:54:37 2006 -0700
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
 The default output printed by \hgcmd{log} is purely a summary; it is
 missing a lot of detail.
 
-Figure~\ref{fig:tour:history} provides a graphical representation of
+Figure~\ref{fig:tour-basic:history} provides a graphical representation of
 the history of the \dirname{hello} repository, to make it a little
 easier to see which direction history is ``flowing'' in.  We'll be
 returning to this figure several times in this chapter and the chapter
@@ -192,19 +192,19 @@
   \centering
   \grafix{tour-history}
   \caption{Graphical history of the \dirname{hello} repository}
-  \label{fig:tour:history}
+  \label{fig:tour-basic:history}
 \end{figure}
 
 \subsection{Changesets, revisions, and talking to other 
   people}
 
 As English is a notoriously sloppy language, and computer science has
-a history of terminological confusion, revision control has a variety
-of terms that have the same meaning.  If you are talking about
-Mercurial history with other people, you will find that the word
-``changeset'' is often compressed to ``change'' or (when written)
-``cset'', and sometimes a changeset is referred to as a ``revision''
-or a ``rev''.
+a hallowed history of terminological confusion (why use one term when
+four will do?), revision control has a variety of words and phrases
+that mean the same thing.  If you are talking about Mercurial history
+with other people, you will find that the word ``changeset'' is often
+compressed to ``change'' or (when written) ``cset'', and sometimes a
+changeset is referred to as a ``revision'' or a ``rev''.
 
 While it doesn't matter what \emph{word} you use to refer to the
 concept of ``a~changeset'', the \emph{identifier} that you use to