2867
|
1 <HTML>
|
|
2 <BODY BGCOLOR=white>
|
|
3
|
|
4 <FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>
|
|
5
|
|
6 <P><B><I>In medias res</I></B></P>
|
|
7
|
|
8 <P>There are two major topic which always causes huge dispute and flame on the
|
|
9 <A HREF="http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/cgi-bin/htsearch">mplayer-users</A>
|
|
10 mailing list. Number one is of course the topic of the</P>
|
|
11
|
|
12 <P><B><I>GCC 2.96 series</I></B></P>
|
|
13
|
|
14 <P>The <I>facts</I> : <B>MPlayer</B>'s compile process needs the
|
|
15 <CODE>--disable-gcc-checking</CODE> to proceed upon detecting a GCC version
|
|
16 of 2.96 (apparently it needs this option on <B>egcs</B> too. It's because we
|
|
17 don't test <B>MPlayer</B> on egcs. Pardon us, but we rather develop <B>MPlayer</B>).
|
|
18 If you know <B>MPlayer</B>, you should know that it has great speed. It
|
|
19 achieves this by having overoptimized MMX/SSE/3DNow/etc codes, fastmemcpy, and
|
|
20 lots of other features.
|
|
21
|
|
22 <P>The <I>background</I> : there were/are the GCC <B>2.95</B> series. The
|
|
23 best of them was 2.95.3 . Please note the style of the version numbering.
|
|
24 This is how the GCC team numbers their compilers. The 2.95 series are good.
|
2910
|
25 We never ever saw anything that was miscompiled because of the 2.95's faultiness.</P>
|
2867
|
26
|
|
27 <P>The <I>action</I> : <B>RedHat</B> started to include a GCC version of <B>2.96</B>
|
|
28 with their distributions. Note the version numbering. This should be the GCC
|
2910
|
29 team's versioning. They patched the CVS version of GCC (something between 2.95 and 3.0)
|
|
30 They patched it very deep, and used this version in the distrib, because 3.0
|
|
31 wasn't out at time.</P>
|
2867
|
32
|
|
33 <P>The <I>statements</I> : most developers around the world begun having
|
|
34 bad feelings about RedHat's GCC 2.96 , and told their RedHat users to
|
|
35 compile with other compiler than 2.96 . RedHat users' disappointment slowly
|
2910
|
36 went into anger. What was all good
|
2867
|
37 for, apart from giving headaches to developers, putting oil on anti-RedHat
|
|
38 flame, confusing users? The answer, I do not know.</P>
|
|
39
|
|
40 <P><I>Present age, present time</I> : RedHat says that GCC 2.96-85 and above
|
|
41 is fixed, and works properly. Note the versioning. They should have started
|
2910
|
42 with something like this. What about GCC 2.96.85 ? It doesn't matter now.
|
|
43 I don't search, but I still see bugs with 2.96 . It doesn't matter now,
|
|
44 hopefully now <B>RedHat will forget about 2.96</B> and turn towards <B>3.0</B>.
|
|
45 Towards a deep patched 3.0...
|
|
46 </P>
|
2867
|
47
|
|
48 <P><I>What I don't understand</I> is why are we hated by RedHat users for
|
|
49 putting warning messages, and stay-away documents in <B>MPlayer</B> .
|
|
50 Why are we called "brain damaged", "total asshole", "childish" by
|
|
51 <B>RedHat users</B>, on our mailing list, and even on the <B>redhat-devel</B> .
|
|
52 They even considered forking <B>MPlayer</B> for themselves. RedHat users.
|
|
53 Why? It's RedHat that made the compiler, why do <U>you</U> have to hate us?
|
|
54 Are you <U>that</U> fellow RedHat worshippers? Please stop it. We don't hold
|
|
55 a grudge against users, doesn't matter how loud you advertise its contrary.
|
|
56 Please go flame Linus Torvalds, the DRI developers (oh, now I know why
|
|
57 there were laid off by VA!), the Wine, avifile. Even if we are arrogant,
|
|
58 are we not the same as the previously listed ones? Why do <B>we</B> have
|
|
59 to suffer from your unrightful wrath?</P>
|
|
60
|
|
61 <P>I'm closing this topic. Think over it please. I (Gabucino) personally begun
|
|
62 with <A HREF="http://www.redhat.com">RedHat</A>, then used Mandrake (sorry I
|
|
63 don't know their URL), now I have <A
|
|
64 HREF="http://www.linuxfromscratch.com">LFS</A>. Never held a grudge against
|
|
65 RedHat or RedHat users, and I still don't. Hate is only comfortable. It
|
|
66 won't bring you anywhere.</P>
|
|
67
|
|
68 <P><B><I>Binary distribution of MPlayer</I></B></P>
|
|
69
|
|
70 <P>I'm too moody now for this.</P>
|
|
71
|
|
72 </HTML>
|