Mercurial > mplayer.hg
annotate DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html @ 4956:84f465d2ff16
KEY_ENTER->quit binding. why doesn't 'pt_step 1' exits if no more file left?
author | arpi |
---|---|
date | Wed, 06 Mar 2002 21:59:24 +0000 |
parents | e67d400b6fde |
children | 6cb9d9a1716d |
rev | line source |
---|---|
2440 | 1 <HTML> |
2 <BODY BGCOLOR=WHITE> | |
2441 | 3 <FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2> |
4 | |
5 <P> | |
6 <B>Question:</B> What is GCC 2.96 ? I can't find it at GNU site. | |
7 </P> | |
8 | |
9 <P> | |
10 <B>Answer:</B> Read the <A HREF="http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html">official answer from GNU GCC team.</A> | |
11 </P> | |
2440 | 12 |
13 <P> | |
14 <B>Question:</B> What is the problem with GCC 2.96 ? And with 3.x ? | |
15 </P> | |
16 | |
17 <P> | |
18 <B>Answer:</B> | |
19 </P> | |
20 | |
4542
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
21 <P>Read in MySQL documentation :</P> |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
22 |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
23 <P><I> |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
24 Compiler Advisory: Several of our users have reported random crashes and |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
25 table corruption with MySQL binaries compiled with gcc two-dot-nine-six on |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
26 the x86 Linux platform. Although we were unable to duplicate the problems |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
27 ourselves or understand their exact cause, we suspect with a great degree of |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
28 confidence that the problem was compiler related. Replacing the faulty binary |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
29 with our binary always eliminated the problem. |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
30 </I></P> |
e67d400b6fde
mysql also goes haywire from sneaky-sucky-fucky gcc2.100-4
gabucino
parents:
3845
diff
changeset
|
31 |
2440 | 32 <P> |
33 And for the people, who periodically asks what are the exact problems with | |
2441 | 34 gcc 2.96, my answer: <I>we don't know exactly.</I> |
35 There were various problems and new problems / bugs come up periodically. | |
36 It is <I>not a single bug/problem</I>. We just see various bugreports, mostly | |
2440 | 37 gcc internal bugs, compiler syntax errors in source or bad code compiled. They |
38 all are solved using different version of gcc. I understand that gcc 2.96 | |
39 has different default optimization flags and they conflicts with our inline | |
40 asm code, but we can't fix them, and we really don't want to fix them as they | |
41 work with other compilers or gcc versions, and the fix may cause speed loss. | |
42 </P> | |
43 | |
44 <P> | |
45 I think that the gcc 2.96 should be fixed to be option-compatible with other | |
46 releases, but redhat guys refused to do it. If someone interested - ask | |
47 Eugene K., avifile author, he has a long mailing with them, because they had | |
48 the same problems with avifile. Finally he changed avifile source to | |
49 <I>workaround</I> gcc 2.96 bugs... | |
50 We simply has no interest and time to do it. | |
51 </P> | |
52 | |
53 <P> | |
54 Ah, and about the pipe-in-comment bug: it wasn't really our bug. | |
55 I've talked one of gcc maintainers, and he told me that gcc 2.96 and 3.x | |
2909 | 56 supports intel asm syntax, and it caused the pipe bug. But it <I>is</I> a bug, |
57 because gcc <I>silently</I>, without any warning, ignored the whole asm block! | |
2440 | 58 </P> |
59 | |
60 <P> | |
61 Other gcc 3.x problems comes from broken libstdc++ or glibc header (std_*.h) | |
62 installation. They are not our fault. MPlayer compiles and works well with | |
63 gcc 3.x versions. <B>Only 2.96 is broken</B>, but it depends on many environment | |
64 elements, including gcc 2.96 release number, enabled mplayer features, etc. | |
65 <I>If it works for you using gcc 2.96, it doesn't mean it will work for everyone.</I> | |
66 </P> | |
67 | |
3053 | 68 <P><B>Answer 2:</B></P> |
69 | |
70 <P> | |
71 Also read <A HREF="users_against_developers.html">this</A> text !!!</P> | |
72 | |
2441 | 73 <P> |
74 <B>Question:</B> No! You are wrong! Everything works with gcc 2.96 <I>but</I> MPlayer | |
75 </P> | |
76 | |
77 <P> | |
78 <B>Answer:</B> | |
79 </P> | |
80 | |
81 <P> | |
82 No. You are wrong! | |
83 Several projects (mainly which source contains high optimized inline asm code) | |
3845 | 84 had problems with gcc 2.96. For example: avifile, MESA / DRI, Wine, ffmpeg, lame, NuppelVideo. |
2441 | 85 But other projects already workarounded gcc bugs (changed code which |
86 triggered compiler bugs) so they work for now. | |
87 </P> | |
88 | |
89 <P> | |
90 <B>Question:</B> No! You are wrong! Everything works with gcc 2.96 <I>including</I> MPlayer | |
91 </P> | |
92 | |
93 <P> | |
94 <B>Answer:</B> | |
95 </P> | |
96 | |
97 Good. Be happy. But you must know, it depends on many environment | |
98 elements, including gcc 2.96 release number, enabled mplayer features, etc. | |
99 <I>If it works for you using gcc 2.96, it doesn't mean it will work for everyone!</I> | |
100 It only means that you are lucky, until you find a problem. But don't forget the | |
101 <B>No.1 rule of gcc 2.96 users: NEVER REPORT BUGS OR PROBLEMS IF YOU ARE USING GCC 2.96</B> | |
102 | |
103 <P> | |
104 <B>Question:</B> Ok. Understood. But I want to give it a try... how to compile with gcc 2.96? | |
105 </P> | |
106 | |
107 <P> | |
108 <B>Answer:</B> Really? Are you sure? Ok. You know... here is it: ./configure --disable-gcc-checking | |
109 </P> | |
110 | |
111 <P> | |
112 <B>Question:</B> No! I don't agree with you, because ... | |
113 </P> | |
114 | |
115 <P> | |
116 <B>Answer:</B> It doesn't matter. Keep your commets for yourself. We're not interested in gcc 2.96 stories. | |
117 </P> | |
118 | |
119 | |
120 </FONT> | |
2440 | 121 </BODY> |
122 </HTML> |