comparison configure.ac @ 29410:6288bbd53f44

Pass around a va_list instead of a pointer to a va_list. Refs #7404 This gets rid of a compile warning for me on x86_64. I don't have an i386 box to test on, but every bit of evidence I can find tells me that it's totally fine to pass around a va_list. We do it in status.c If this breaks compilation for you or you get a warning from perl-handlers.c then pleaes let me know! Or just disapprove this

29409:f521dd7c75b5

                struct tm tm;
                tm.tm_gmtoff = 1;
        ], ac_cv_struct_tm_gmtoff=yes, ac_cv_struct_tm_gmtoff=no))
if test $ac_cv_struct_tm_gmtoff = yes; then
        AC_DEFINE(HAVE_TM_GMTOFF, 1, [Define if you have a tm_gmtoff member in struct tm])
fi

AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether va_lists can be copied by value], ac_cv_va_val_copy,[
	AC_TRY_RUN([#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
	void f (int i, ...) {
	va_list args1, args2;
	va_start (args1, i);
	args2 = args1;
	if (va_arg (args2, int) != 42 || va_arg (args1, int) != 42)
	  exit (1);
	va_end (args1); va_end (args2);
	}
	int main() {
	  f (0, 42);
	  return 0;
	}],
	[ac_cv_va_val_copy=yes],
	[ac_cv_va_val_copy=no],
	[ac_cv_va_val_copy=yes])
])

if test "x$ac_cv_va_val_copy" = "xno"; then
	AC_DEFINE(VA_COPY_AS_ARRAY, 1, ['va_lists' cannot be copied as values])
fi

dnl #######################################################################
dnl # Check for check
dnl #######################################################################

29410:6288bbd53f44

                struct tm tm;
                tm.tm_gmtoff = 1;
        ], ac_cv_struct_tm_gmtoff=yes, ac_cv_struct_tm_gmtoff=no))
if test $ac_cv_struct_tm_gmtoff = yes; then
        AC_DEFINE(HAVE_TM_GMTOFF, 1, [Define if you have a tm_gmtoff member in struct tm])
fi

dnl #######################################################################
dnl # Check for check
dnl #######################################################################